Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DanielSai
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2017
    • 3

    Shorter forward reads than reverse

    Hello,
    I'm DanielSai from Australia.

    I did a next gen run on my sample using the illumina miseq machine. I'm getting shorter forward sequence reads than the reverse reads. What could be the problem and how can it rectified in subsequent runs?
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    You have not given much details but one reason would be sequencing configuration for example, R1 was set to less cycles than R2.

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      There is no logical reason (other than an assymetric run setup mentioned by @nucacidhunter) to get shorter R1 reads compared to R2. What kind of sequencing are you doing and what is the run setup?

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        Have the reads been trimmed?

        Comment

        • DanielSai
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2017
          • 3

          #5
          Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
          Have the reads been trimmed?
          Yes, reads have been trimmed

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            Originally posted by DanielSai View Post
            Yes, reads have been trimmed
            Then it is odd that only R1 was trimmed (or trimmed to a larger extent than R2). If you have short inserts (and thus read-through into adapters on other end) then R2 reads should also be trimmed to a similar extent.

            You still need to address questions in other comments above.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...