Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pejman
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 23

    Suspicious results from CuffDiff

    Hey folks
    I'm running CuffDiff from the release 0.9.2, for RNAseq. I use it with tophat, and Reference annotation for human data. Here's the simple running command:


    Code:
    cuffdiff --FDR 0.01 -N hg18_annotation01.gtf accepted_hits1.bam accepted_hits2.bam

    There are few points of concern

    first: over 90% of the genes with "status = OK" have "Significant = yes" which is kinda not so nice.

    second: that there are so many genes with very low FPKM that are among the significant ones, which can also lead to fold changes like: 1.7977e+308 !

    and third: There are genes with large FPKMs that have not been tested (status = NOTEST) , here's some sample, from the file "genes_expr.diff", with a "NOTEST gene with hight FPKM, and two low FPKM genes with test status "OK":


    Code:
    ttest_id	status	value_1	value_2	ln(fold_change)	test_stat	p_value	significant
    NR_036659	NOTEST	1119.85	6601.74	1.774 		-54.911 	0	no
    NM_001130440	OK	5.6E-09	5.7E-09	0.030 		-1.744 		0.081	no
    NM_001001977	OK	9.7E-09	1.2E-08	0.227	 	-18.416 	0	yes
    Does somebody have some idea? :-/

    thanks
    pej
  • Boel
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 62

    #2
    Hi Pejman,

    Any progress with the fact that so many of the genes with "status = OK" have "Significant = yes"? Kind of seeing the same thing.

    Boel

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...