Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lamon
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 9

    #1

    bbduk.sh barcode filter

    Does the barcode filter in bbduk.sh (v37.66) only allow perfect matches or are mismatches allowed?
    Thanks,
    Lynn
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    What barcode filter are you referring? Generally with "hdist=N" paramter you can allow or disallow (hdist=0) mismatches.

    Comment

    • lamon
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 9

      #3
      I'm referring to these parameters:
      barcodefilter=t barcodes=TCTCGCGC
      As far as I can see from my results right now, only reads with exactly this sequence in the header are retained. I think this may be too stringent. Does the 'hdist' parameter affect the barcode given how short it is?

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        I see. I have not personally used this feature since most of barcode work is done at the bcl2fastq stage, where you can allow for errors in sequence.

        What exactly are you trying to do? Eliminate reads with some barcodes? I don't think the hdist= parameter is going to apply for the barcodes. It is for errors in the main read. You may have to look for an alternate way to do this. Perhaps using "demuxbyname.sh" may be a better option. Take a look at that.

        Comment

        • lamon
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 9

          #5
          Thanks for the reply. I have a set of large paired-end fastq files that were preprocessed by a sequencing core and I suspect that they were never demultiplexed because the file is quite large and may have had its own lane or flowcell. The headers contain barcodes that are mostly TCTCGCGC or that string with one or two mismatches but there are also barcodes that are wildly different and I want to strip those out without stripping what are probably legit barcodes with 1 or 2 mismatches. When I tried demuxbyname.sh, it started writing out 2x80,000 files, two for every barcode variant present.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            Use the code I have in this post to enumerate all the different barcodes present in your file. That should give you an idea of the complexity of the problem. Then choose the ones you want (that actually should belong to your samples since you made them) to demux and use only those with demuxbyname.sh.

            Comment

            • lamon
              Junior Member
              • Aug 2011
              • 9

              #7
              I have already looked at all the barcodes. I've got 76,959 different barcodes that are not exact matches accounting for about 48 million reads. If allow 1 mismatch, I could recover 16 million of those. If I allow 2 mismatches, I could recover 24 million.

              Comment

              • lamon
                Junior Member
                • Aug 2011
                • 9

                #8
                I wrote a perl script using the fuzzy match module (Text::Fuzzy) to pull all the entries with no more than two mismatches in the barcode. It's not much but I can send to anyone who is interested.

                Comment

                • GenoMax
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 7142

                  #9
                  In future just ask the sequence provider to re-do the demultiplexing with bcl2fastq. You are paying them for it anyway :-)

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • kinpict.com
                    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                    by kinpict.com
                    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                    Today, 06:37 PM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                    by SEQadmin2





                    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                  0 responses
                  27 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                  0 responses
                  35 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                  2 responses
                  56 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post kinpict.com  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                  0 responses
                  175 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...