Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dean22April
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2017
    • 1

    #1

    Have I written this correctly?

    Hi, I'm in a group investigating gene editing in wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 and we have the Illumina MiSeq sequencing results but I am unsure how to succinctly present the analysis we did (I have next to no understanding of bioinformatics- I did not do the analysis myself but am writing it up for an undergraduate report).

    I was therefore wondering if the following made sense (I have all the individual commands which I will put in the supplementary materials). This is my best shot so far (I've had to anonymise names until results are published):

    Initial sequence quality was checked using FastQCv0.10.1. Illumina adaptor sequences were then removed using cutadapt version 1.14. Reads were then trimmed by quality score using fastq-mcf (Version: 1.05.676). A custom perl script was then run on reads to separate samples used in this study from ----- ------’ (University of ****, UK) samples. To ensure the bowtie2 aligner could be used, pairfq (version 0.17.0) was used to create new fastq files that only contained mate pair reads. Bowtie2 index for reference sequences was then built. Sequence alignments for each set of reads was then set up and sam tools were used to convert sam (Sequence Alignment Map) alignment files to a binary bamfile, this was then sorted and a bam index was created. Bam files were visualised using the Tablet software. Refer to supplementary information for individual commands.


    Does this make sense? What else (and where in that paragraph) should I have included?

    Any help would be extremely well appreciated.

    Thank you so much
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For an undergraduate report that description is fine.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...