Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rmf
    Junior Member
    • May 2016
    • 9

    #1

    BBMap pileup questions

    I am interested in metrics that summarise coverage from my BAM file. I came across BBMap pileup which does a decent job. But I have a couple of questions.

    1. It seems like if a window is provided to pileup, it returns the sum over the given window. Can other metrics such as sum/mean/median/min/max/sd/mad be calculated? I am particularly interested in the median.

    2. Does pileup do only fixed windows or can it do sliding window metrics?

    3. BBMap pileup returns a summary over the whole file to the console like below:

    Average coverage: 71.19
    Standard deviation: 198.58
    Percent scaffolds with any coverage: 100.00
    Percent of reference bases covered: 97.66

    Can this be saved to a file? I tried '> summary.txt' at the end of my script but that didn't work.

    Thanks,
    Roy
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Have you tried using "out=" to save the results to a file.

    Comment

    • silask
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2017
      • 9

      #3
      Hallo,

      I assembled metagenomic reads and want to know how many reads are mapping to the contigs.

      I created a sam file using bbwrap for paired-end libraries with singletons. So the sam files consist of paired and unpared reads.

      The log file of bbwrap shows me that for different samples reads are mapped usually 40-70% of the paired and 30-50% of the singeltons. However, the pileup log files say that in all samples 48-49% of reads were mapped. This makes no sense to me.

      I used v 37.78 and activated physical coverage.
      Can pileup not handle paired end + singletons in the same file?


      Edit:
      it seems that it's due to the physical cov.
      Last edited by silask; 06-04-2018, 12:18 AM.

      Comment

      • silask
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2017
        • 9

        #4
        There is still something strange.

        in the log file of bbwrap I have


        Code:
        * | Paired end | Se
        -- | -- | --
        Total reads | 2 x 16895000 | 31401969
        mapped | 2x 13408609 | 29907540
        * | * | *
        mapped | 79% | 95%
        Which seem to be correct. e.g. the number of unmapped reads are found in `outu`


        in the logfile of pilup it is written:
        Code:
        Reads: | 27370533
        -- | --
        Mapped reads: | 26817218
        Mapped bases: | 4022582700
        Ref scaffolds: | 851270
        Ref bases: | 1216084673
        * | *
        Percent mapped: | 97.978
        Percent proper pairs: | 97.978
        I have no Idea, how pilup finds only 27370533 reads.
        Last edited by GenoMax; 06-06-2018, 04:34 AM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2






          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...