Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mick
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2016
    • 1

    #1

    How to compare single-end vs paired-end RNA-seq data?

    Hi all,

    I’d like to compare RNA-seq data of WT (single-end RNA-seq) vs KO strain(paired-end RNA-seq), as follows:

    wt 0hr 1hr 3hr (single-end)
    KO 0hr 1hr 3hr (paired-end)


    Since I’m interested in the differentially expressed genes during time course between wt and KO strains, I thought by using bedtools multicov option, I can compare these data.

    I used the following commands;

    bedtools multicov -s -bams wt_0hr.bam wt_1hr.bam wt_3hr.bam -bed gene.bed > wt0-1-3hr.txt
    bedtools multicov -s -bams KO_0hr.bam KO_1hr.bam KO_3hr.bam -p -bed gene.bed > KO0-1-3hr.txt

    (If options were not correct, please let me know.)

    My questions are...

    *How does bedtools multicov treat paired-end reads? I mean, if both ends of a paired-end read were mapped to the same gene in the BED file are they then counted once or twice?

    *If comparing same condition data (= same sample preparation method), is it OK to compare the read count calculated from bed tools multicov?(Is there any need of normalizing data, like FPKM/RPKM or something?)


    Thanks in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
74 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...