Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DNAjunk
    Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 62

    samtools pileup c-option changes read quality

    Hi

    I might be wrong but I got the impression that when using the c-option in the pileup process, then the read qualities are changed (near an indel, N's are placed also):
    (I am using version 0.1.9 but version 0.1.10 seems to be the same). I am sure that there is an explanation, but I dont know it! Thanks for help!

    Example: the differences are lines 68-71

    with c option: (jump to line 67-75)
    /apps/bi/samtools/c/samtools pileup -c test.bam -f test_ref.fa | less
    test 67 A A 30 0 60 1 . 1
    test 68 C N 0 0 0 1 . (
    test 69 C N 0 0 0 1 . %
    test 70 C N 0 0 0 1 . !
    test 71 C N 0 0 0 1 .-1C !
    test 71 * -C/-C 40 0 60 1 -C * 1 0 0 0 0
    test 72 C N 0 0 0 1 * <
    test 73 T T 30 0 60 1 . <
    test 74 A A 30 0 60 1 . @
    test 75 T T 30 0 60 1 . 1


    without c option: (jump to line 67-75)
    /apps/bi/samtools/c/samtools pileup test.bam -f test_ref.fa | less
    test 67 A 1 . 1
    test 68 C 1 . 1
    test 69 C 1 . 1
    test 70 C 1 . 1
    test 71 C 1 .-1C 1
    test 72 C 1 * <
    test 73 T 1 . <
    test 74 A 1 . @
    test 75 T 1 . 1

    Here is my test.sam file

    @HD VN:0.0 GO:none SO:coordinate
    @SQ SN:test LN:360
    @PG ID:map2sam
    GLXM4QB02GKAEH 0 test 1 255 71M1D17M1D20M1I147M * 0 0 GATCTCTTTTTCCAGTTTAAAAGTTCAGCTATTACAAGGTAAATGCAAAATGACAGTAAGGTTCCCACCCCTATTTTTCATCTTTTATGTCAAGAAGATACTTGTAAAAGAGAAGTAAGGTTAGGTATGATATTCGTTTATAAAGCATTTGGTGGAATACAGCGGTGGCAGGAAGTTGAACTGTCAACATTTTTGACCGTGTCAATTCATTTAATACATGTAGCCTGTATCTATTGAGTATATGGTACACATGCGG BAAABB55733>><94444444=99??>??<888?<<<89333=996666ABA???CDBAAAA<<;11111<@11100=?A?44444/4894443<98===993/.,,,-,559531266><866669:<<32444339@9;;<BBB???::8AAAA???DDDDDBBA?>===83../..33:8:9921,,,,,..--558875555:3...222679::9:32449898<<<<=AAAA@@<84449:666<::--


    Here is the test_ref.fa file

    >test
    GATCTCTTTTTCCAGTTTAAAAGTTCAGCTATTACAAGGTAAATGCAAAATGACAGTAAG
    GTTCCCACCCCCTATTTTTCATCTTTTATTGTCAAGAAGATACTTGCAAAGAGAAGTAAG
    GTTAGGTATGATATTCGTTTATAAAGCATTTGGTGGAATACAGCGGTGGCAGGAAGTTGA
    ACTGTCAACATTTTGTACCGTGTCAATTCATTTAATACATGTAGCCTGTATCTATTGAGT
    ATATGGTACACATGCGGAAGTGTTCTGAGGATAAAGTCACGAAAAAAAAAAGGCACAATT
    CTTGTTTTCAGGGAGATTATGTTCTAGTGAGGAGAATAATAGAAGAAGAAAGTCCCACTC
  • Cynthia3.14
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 1

    #2
    base quality score changes option -c samtools pileup and mpileup

    Hi,

    I can confirm this bug, as I had also noticed base quality scores changes with -c option, when I compared the number of high quality en low quality bases of a first mapping to a remapping against a sample specific reference. It appeared that low quality (LQ) bases, in the first mapping turned into high (HQ) quality bases, at positions were initially the reads did not match the reference and did in the remapping. So, I checked this problem with 10 reads at positions where a mutation occurred:

    first mapping
    ref HQ_A HQ_C HQ_G HQ_T LQ_A LQ_C LQ_G LQ_T
    T 0 2 0 1 0 7 0 0
    second mapping
    ref HQ_A HQ_C HQ_G HQ_T LQ_A LQ_C LQ_G LQ_T
    C 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0

    When the pileup was made without the option -c, these changes did not happen. Also, mpileup seems to have this same problem.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...