Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rammohanshukla
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 4

    #1

    Deseq2 design clarification

    Hi, I am working with human postmortem samples wherein I have 5 groups of subjects:

    A. Control: 20 samples
    B. First episode: 20 samples
    C. First episode Remission: 15 samples
    D. Second episode: 20 samples
    E. Second episode Remission: 15 samples


    Note that the progression of A to B to C to D to E is expected to be in phase (something like sinusoidal curve)

    I also have other parameters for the samples, which include: Age, Sex, RIN value, PMI (postmortem interval), pH of the sample


    I wish to test the difference of the 5 groups in ANOVA like analysis in DEseq2 but after controlling for Age, Sex, RIN value, PMI (postmortem interval), pH of the sample

    My phenotype table looks like this:

    Sample Age Sex Rin PMI pH DiseaseStage
    1 binned factor binned binned binned Control
    2 Control
    3 First episode
    . First episode
    . First episode
    . .
    . .
    90 Second episode Remission



    This is my design
    dds <- DESeqDataSet(se, design = ~ Age+Sex+RIN+PMI+pH+DiseaseStage)

    dds <- DESeq(dds, test = "LRT", reduced = ~ Age+Sex+RIN+PMI+pH)
    results(dds)

    I am hoping that I get 1 p-value for ANOVA like comparisons between the disease stage after controlling for Age, Sex, RIN, PMI and pH
    Also, I would like to know how many variables I can control for in the design? For instance, here I am using 5 (Age, Sex, RIN, PMI and pH) is it okay? If yes, is there any rule to how many variables to control for in the design?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...