Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kulikov
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 3

    #106
    Originally posted by boetsie View Post
    Hi Kulikov,

    Are the contigs of summary1.txt a mix of the two assemblies? In other words; are parts of the contigs present in other contigs? Because what i think has happened, is that reads could map to multiple contigs. SSPACE does not allow reads to map to multiple contigs.

    Boetsie
    Hi Boetsie,

    No, contigs1 is not a mix. This is just a raw set of contigs. contigs2 are obtained from contigs1 after repeat resolving stage. I guess some parts of contigs may be present in other contigs (in contigs1), but it is still strange that no pair is found on contigs.

    Btw, what happens if not only a read, but also its reverse complementary is mapped somewhere?

    Comment

    • boetsie
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 245

      #107
      Originally posted by kulikov View Post
      Hi Boetsie,

      No, contigs1 is not a mix. This is just a raw set of contigs. contigs2 are obtained from contigs1 after repeat resolving stage. I guess some parts of contigs may be present in other contigs (in contigs1), but it is still strange that no pair is found on contigs.

      Btw, what happens if not only a read, but also its reverse complementary is mapped somewhere?
      Could you check two things;
      - are there are any readfiles generated for this project in folder 'reads'?
      - If there are, can you try to run it on a subset of your contigs (2 contigs for example) and see how if any reads align.

      If a read can map to more than one location (reverse complement and normal) it is not used for scaffolding.

      Regards,
      Boetsie

      Comment

      • Ashu
        Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 15

        #108
        Hi Boetsie,
        I was trying to use test the with extension x -1 , and it takes a lot of time and memory, I dont have a memory problem, but time. What is your experience with a mouse genome, around 75x coverage
        Thank you in advance,
        cheers,
        Ashu

        Comment

        • boetsie
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 245

          #109
          Hi Ashu,

          I know it takes a lot of time to extend the contigs, especially with large genomes. Can you tell me what part takes up the most time?

          I've speeded up some things of contig extension in the SSPACE premium, you can give it a shot. One thing is the mapping of the reads against the contigs, which is now multithreaded. Another is the search for partial overlap of the reads on the contigs, which uses a faster method.

          I've never ran SSPACE extension on a eukaryotic genome myself, sorry i can't tell you.

          Regards,
          Boetsie

          Comment

          • Ashu
            Member
            • Aug 2010
            • 15

            #110
            Hi Boetsie,
            Thank you for your suggestions, I will try it. Can you may be show the parameters you used for the panda.
            Thank you,
            Cheers,
            Ashu

            Comment

            • boetsie
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 245

              #111
              Originally posted by Ashu View Post
              Hi Boetsie,
              Thank you for your suggestions, I will try it. Can you may be show the parameters you used for the panda.
              Thank you,
              Cheers,
              Ashu
              For the Panda genome I did not do any extension. For scaffolding I used

              -x = 0
              -k = 3
              -a = 0.7
              -n = 15

              Regards,
              Boetsie

              Comment

              • kulikov
                Junior Member
                • Sep 2011
                • 3

                #112
                Originally posted by boetsie View Post
                Could you check two things;
                - are there are any readfiles generated for this project in folder 'reads'?
                - If there are, can you try to run it on a subset of your contigs (2 contigs for example) and see how if any reads align.

                If a read can map to more than one location (reverse complement and normal) it is not used for scaffolding.

                Regards,
                Boetsie
                Hi Boetsie,

                Yes, this was caused by the fact that each contig was present together with its reverse complementary. After leaving only one contig from each pair everything works great.

                Thank you for your help and for designing SSPACE! =)

                Best,
                Sasha

                Comment

                • boetsie
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 245

                  #113
                  Originally posted by kulikov View Post
                  Hi Boetsie,

                  Yes, this was caused by the fact that each contig was present together with its reverse complementary. After leaving only one contig from each pair everything works great.

                  Thank you for your help and for designing SSPACE! =)

                  Best,
                  Sasha
                  Ah, great! Good that the problem is solved. I already thought something like that was happening.

                  Thanks for the support and the nice comments!

                  Boetsie

                  Comment

                  • colindaven
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 417

                    #114
                    Hi Sspace users,

                    just a bug report and solution we experienced here on a Suse 64 bit system.

                    We had this error

                    "
                    =>Thu Sep 8 13:45:01 2011: Building Bowtie index for contigs (/working/colin/seq/cloneC/sspace/C40A_454AllContigs.fna)

                    Bowtie-build error; -1 at (directory)"

                    There was an issue with bowtie-build.

                    We solved by making sure the bowtie executables were all executable, ie. chmod a+x on the files in the SSPACE/bowtie subdirectory. We also did chmod g+w though that likely didn't do much.

                    cheers

                    Comment

                    • rskr
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 249

                      #115
                      What is the run-time complexity for SSPACE? It seems that we are having trouble getting it to scale, and what was taking days on a smaller set is now taking several weeks on a larger set. Also is there anyway to get the alignments to be done in parallel?

                      Comment

                      • boetsie
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 245

                        #116
                        Originally posted by rskr View Post
                        What is the run-time complexity for SSPACE? It seems that we are having trouble getting it to scale, and what was taking days on a smaller set is now taking several weeks on a larger set. Also is there anyway to get the alignments to be done in parallel?
                        Can you comment on what part of SSPACE you are having trouble, is it with contig extension or scaffolding?

                        In the SSPACE premium version i've made the read-in and Bowtie mapping multithreaded. Also the results are immmediately read-in into SSPACE, instead of writing the results to files and reading of those files. Extension has also speeded-up by immediately read-in of the results and faster way of finding overlap of the reads on the contigs.

                        Regards,
                        Boetsie

                        Comment

                        • rskr
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 249

                          #117
                          Originally posted by boetsie View Post
                          Can you comment on what part of SSPACE you are having trouble, is it with contig extension or scaffolding?

                          In the SSPACE premium version i've made the read-in and Bowtie mapping multithreaded. Also the results are immmediately read-in into SSPACE, instead of writing the results to files and reading of those files. Extension has also speeded-up by immediately read-in of the results and faster way of finding overlap of the reads on the contigs.

                          Regards,
                          Boetsie
                          The basic version, but one that I have modified to read bwa files instead.

                          Comment

                          • Kennels
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 149

                            #118
                            Hi boetsie

                            Is there a version for an Itanium machine (linux IA64)? Or anyway to compile it for such?

                            cheers,
                            kennels

                            Comment

                            • boetsie
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 245

                              #119
                              Originally posted by Kennels View Post
                              Hi boetsie

                              Is there a version for an Itanium machine (linux IA64)? Or anyway to compile it for such?

                              cheers,
                              kennels
                              Hi Kennels,

                              I think the perl script will work everywhere, so it depends on Bowtie.
                              if there is a bowtie version that works for the Itanium machine, you can place the bowtie scripts in the bowtie folder of SSPACE.

                              Regards,
                              Boetsie

                              Comment

                              • Lisa0508
                                Junior Member
                                • Nov 2011
                                • 9

                                #120
                                Hi Boetzer,
                                Thank you so much for your quick reply and patient explanation! It's working now. I just got registered on this forum yesterday. All settings were in a default condition. I'm very sorry I did not check the private message option. Now it's O.K. to recieve private messages. Thank you again!
                                Regards,
                                Lisa

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                                  by SEQadmin2



                                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                                  ...
                                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                                  by SEQadmin2


                                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                                  ...
                                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
                                0 responses
                                9 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                                0 responses
                                19 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                                0 responses
                                16 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                                0 responses
                                27 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Working...