Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #1

    New Journal: Open Research Computation

    I find this extremely exciting for those writing and supporting software tools:!

    Journal:


    Editor's blog:
    Last edited by nilshomer; 12-13-2010, 11:10 AM.
  • simonandrews
    Simon Andrews
    • May 2009
    • 870

    #2
    That's a really interesting take on a computational biology journal. We've been talking for a while now about how there is a lack of suitable places to publish research software.

    I'll be interested to see how strictly they adhere to their rules about documentation and unit tests, and how many high profile projects meet those standards.

    Comment

    • dawe
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 258

      #3
      Nice, thanks!
      Let's see what they propose, as they accepting many things, from code snippets to full software...

      Comment

      • dawe
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 258

        #4
        I'm a bit scared about the note in the editor's blog:

        The submission criteria for ORC Software Articles are stringent. The source code must be available, on an appropriate public repository under an OSI compliant license. Running code, in the form of executables, or an instance of a service must be made available. Documentation of the code will be expected to a very high standard, consistent with best practice in the language and research domain, and it must cover all public methods and classes. Similarly code testing must be in place covering, by default, 100% of the code. Finally all the claims, use cases, and figures in the paper must have associated with them test data, with examples of both input data and the outputs expected.
        according to this, more than half of the software I've seen couldn't be published :-)

        d

        Comment

        • nilshomer
          Nils Homer
          • Nov 2008
          • 1283

          #5
          It's a high standard, but when one software group starts meeting those standards and promotes itself as the only one that does, others will follow.

          Comment

          • dawe
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 258

            #6
            Originally posted by nilshomer View Post
            It's a high standard, but when one software group starts meeting those standards and promotes itself as the only one that does, others will follow.
            I do agree but... take a widely used software for NGS, such as samtools, the code is poorly documented (and commented)... I guess that won't be accepted as is... Also, I think I will spend the next two weeks in commenting and documenting my code to submit it :-)

            Comment

            • cameronneylon
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 1

              #7
              Hi All. Glad that you find the journal exciting. The standard is deliberately set pretty high. Our aim is to raise standards across computational research and in many cases (some more than others obviously) there is a long way to raise them.

              The basic requirement that we've set is that testing and documentation has to be at least equal to best practice in the language or research domain. At the end of the day the editors will have to make a judgement as to what this means in practice but you can expect that it means pretty top notch documentation and good coverage for automated tests. We know that some things can't really be tested easily or productively and we won't make people jump through hoops for no reason but at the same time we fully intend that the requirements to be tougher than the majority of current research software reaches.

              The idea is to make publishing with us a mark of the highest quality. That way, you guys want to publish, that helps us to help you to raise standards and we all work together to make research software better than it is at the moment and work towards it being as good as it can be.

              Cheers

              Cameron [ORC Editor in Chief]

              Comment

              • kmcarr
                Senior Member
                • May 2008
                • 1181

                #8
                So it appears this journal is not going to happen. From their website:

                Important notice to authors:

                It is with regret that we wish to inform you that Open Research Computation will no longer be launching as a journal within its own right. Instead, it will be launching as an ongoing thematic series within another BMC journal Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

                This thematics series will aim to continue to promote the innovative ideas central to Open Research Computation, and to provide a platform for the discussion of these ideas.

                If you wish to submit your manuscript to this thematic series, please click here, and clearly indicate within your cover letter that you wish your manuscript to be considered as part of the Open Research Computation thematic series. If you have any queries, please contact the Editor-in-Chief, Cameron Neylon.

                Open Research Computation is due to close on 8th May 2012.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                16 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                15 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                42 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...