Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aushev
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 21

    #1

    Wrong mapping with BBmap default parameters

    I performed mapping for my RNA-seq data (150 bp reads) with BBMap, just the default parameters (the only special parameter set was low memory):
    Code:
    bbmap.sh ref=gencode.v29.transcripts.fa path=index_bb_lomem in=sampleA_1.fq.gz out=sampleA.bam overwrite=f usemodulo
    When I looked in the resulting sam file, I noticed that for many reads I had CIGAR string looking like this:
    2=4X6=11I1X7=1X3=1X14=1X2=1X1=1X15=1X3=2X9=1X9=2X21=2X23=1X5=
    This how the alignment looked (upper line is the read, lower is suggested hit):
    CAGAAGTCAAGGAGTAATTTAGGAGTAATTTTGACTTTCAAGTCTTATTACTTAATAAATACATTTCATAAAGCTACAGCTGCCATAGATAGTGATTCCTCTGATGGATCTGGGCAAAGTCAATTGAAAACCTTCTGGAAAGGAGTCACC
    ..TGGA......************G.......C...C..............T..G.G...............G...CT.........G.........GT.....................CA.......................T.....

    It is clearly incorrect mapping: this read should be just assigned to unmapped. From 1414 reads assigned to my gene of interest (attached), 949 had editing distance of 21 and more (34 reads had distance of 40 and more, up to 357!), i.e. obviously didn't belong to that gene. It means that a lot of the counts I get with the default settings are totally wrong. I am wondering if this is normal result for the mapper and what parameters I need to adjust to avoid this issue - `minratio`, `minind`, or something else?
    Attached Files
  • colindaven
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 417

    #2
    Bit late, but you could do this

    nmtag=f Write NM tags.

    and then filter by NM = number of mismatches later.

    This might be easier:

    editfilter=-1 Ban alignments with more than this many edits.

    OR also

    idfilter=0 Independant of minid; sets exact minimum identity
    allowed for alignments to be printed. Range 0 to 1.
    (set to 0.95 ?)

    subfilter=-1 Ban alignments with more than this many substitutions.
    (set to 5 ?)

    Comment

    • aushev
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 21

      #3
      Colin, thanks a lot for your input!
      (Unfortunately for now I had to switch to STAR because it's hard to get help for BBmap questions while STAR's author is very responsive and helpful)

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...