Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why is ML/NJ phylogeny different from SNP tree?

    Greetings.

    I am working on a bacterial genome. We have determined the complete genome sequence of this genome and want to study the evolutionary relationship of my genome and its VERY CLOSE relatives (within the same species).

    I need to construct a tree for these genomes.

    First, I generated a tree based on the number of SNPS detected in conserved genomic region (~80% of whole genome).

    I also constructed trees based on the conserved genomic sequence using ML and NJ methods. The two trees with ML and NJ have the same topology.

    When I compared the ML/NJ trees with the SNP tree, it shows the different phylogenetic relationship of some genomes.

    When I checked the published papers, it seems most studies like inferring trees using the number of SNPs, especially for the very closed genomes. I think the ML/NJ trees based on the sequence information should be much better than the number of SNPs.


    We got two trees with different topologies. I couldn't get a reason for the difference. Does anybody have any comments? which tree should I use? how to explain the difference?


    Many thanks,
    Salmon

  • #2
    Hi Salmon,

    How do you make your SNPs tree?

    Thank you

    MM

    Comment


    • #3
      Well, you use a bunch of methods and you get a bunch of different trees, that is usual. If you add, for instance, analysis of genomic rearrangements, you will get one more tree, some phenotypic traits will support yet another one and so on. So, pls do the following.
      1) Give us some more details on analysis protocol, esp. on application of ML on 80% of genome (either I misunderstood you or it was incredibly computationally expensive) and on how exactly you built the SNP tree.
      2) You don't mention whether you take into account horizontal gene transfer. If you do not, you surely must, because otherwise it may mislead your inference.
      3) Consider using consensus tree or, better, consensus network for representing results, if everything else fails.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      46 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X