Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ssing
    Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 21

    Alignment Questions

    Dear all,

    I am working with 454 sequence from a transcriptome of an organism 2 million years diverged from the rat. De novo assembly using Newbler was very disappointing, so we are trying other software that uses the reference genome as a guide....however, most of these alignment software are designed for shorter reads (<60 bp) or don't feed well into an assembly viewing software like EagleViewer/Consed.

    MOSAIK is our best bet right now, but we are having challenges getting it to run on our machine (64 bit vs 32 bit issues). Any other suggestions?

    Thanks!
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    I think the original Euler will work on longer reads. Euler SR is the new version, for short reads. I don't know about visualizing contigs after, though.

    Comment

    • hlu
      Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 32

      #3
      GS De NOVO Assembler (newbler) has its issue with repeat rich transcriptome reads.

      MIRA claims to use repeat region and support EST for 454 data.

      I have never used MIRA and I am looking at this myself. Give it try.

      Comment

      • sklages
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 628

        #4
        You have mentioned Consed. Why not using it for alignment of your 454 data to a reference sequence? This is possible since version 17.0. There is a version 18 freshly out.
        Consed uses cross_match (in a new version as well) for aligning the reads.

        But keep in mind that none the programs can handle splice events! That will cause problems.
        Mapping ESTs may be done ESTmapper or similar programs.

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          We do a lot of de novo transcriptome assembly from 454 data and have worked up the following pipeline.

          First you have to clean the heck out of the raw data; we use a combination of cross_match, SeqClean (see link below) and fuzznuc (part of the EMBOSS package). Most of our researchers provide us with cDNA which has been prepared using the Clontech SMART cDNA construction kit so you have to make sure to get all remnants of the adapter sequence off the reads.

          Then we assemble the reads using the TGI Clustering tools. Both SeqClean and TGICL were originally developed at TIGR but are now maintained at the DFCI (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/software). TGICL is itself a pipeline which first clusters the reads based on on similarity scores and then assembles the clusters using CAP3. We use a fairly stringent set of parameters here.

          We then take the contigs produced from the step above and reassemble the whole group using CAP3. For this round we use less stringent parameters.

          The assemblies produced are not going to be perfect. There will be considerable redundancy in your final set of contigs (that is, multiple contigs which likely represent the same gene), indels (particularly at homopolymer runs) and some chimeras.

          If you want to try reference guided assembly have a look at PASA (http://pasa.sourceforge.net). I used it recently on a project combining 454 and Sanger reads and it worked quite well. Of course I had a draft genome of the organism which the EST came from. I'm not sure how well it would work in your case. It would really depend on how well you are able to align the 454 reads to the Rat genome.

          Comment

          • mchaisso
            Member
            • Apr 2008
            • 84

            #6
            Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
            I think the original Euler will work on longer reads. Euler SR is the new version, for short reads. I don't know about visualizing contigs after, though.
            euler-sr is a bit of a misnomer since although it was designed for short reads, you can input a file of chromosomes as reads. I've had little experience with titanium reads, but it does a decent job at assembling/clustering other 454 reads. At one point in time I was working on a method to visualize contig coverage, but shelved the project until more people cared.

            Comment

            • bioinfosm
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 483

              #7
              Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
              We do a lot of de novo transcriptome assembly from 454 data and have worked up the following pipeline.

              First you have to clean the heck out of the raw data; we use a combination of cross_match, SeqClean (see link below) and fuzznuc (part of the EMBOSS package). Most of our researchers provide us with cDNA which has been prepared using the Clontech SMART cDNA construction kit so you have to make sure to get all remnants of the adapter sequence off the reads.

              Then we assemble the reads using the TGI Clustering tools. Both SeqClean and TGICL were originally developed at TIGR but are now maintained at the DFCI (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/software). TGICL is itself a pipeline which first clusters the reads based on on similarity scores and then assembles the clusters using CAP3. We use a fairly stringent set of parameters here.

              We then take the contigs produced from the step above and reassemble the whole group using CAP3. For this round we use less stringent parameters.

              The assemblies produced are not going to be perfect. There will be considerable redundancy in your final set of contigs (that is, multiple contigs which likely represent the same gene), indels (particularly at homopolymer runs) and some chimeras.

              If you want to try reference guided assembly have a look at PASA (http://pasa.sourceforge.net). I used it recently on a project combining 454 and Sanger reads and it worked quite well. Of course I had a draft genome of the organism which the EST came from. I'm not sure how well it would work in your case. It would really depend on how well you are able to align the 454 reads to the Rat genome.
              I heard of a reference guided de-novo type alignment tool coming out for short reads, but not sure where to follow up..
              Any idea of such reference guided assembler for short reads .. bacterial and higher genomes?
              --
              bioinfosm

              Comment

              • avilella
                Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 34

                #8
                Hi ssing,

                I've recently been working on a method to cluster transcriptome reads and reconstruct cDNA models for species that don't have a reference genome, using existing gene family information as cross-species reference.

                If you are still looking at ways to analyse your data, I could give a try. Can you contact me at avilella - ebi - ac - uk?

                Cheers

                Originally posted by ssing View Post
                Dear all,

                I am working with 454 sequence from a transcriptome of an organism 2 million years diverged from the rat. De novo assembly using Newbler was very disappointing, so we are trying other software that uses the reference genome as a guide....however, most of these alignment software are designed for shorter reads (<60 bp) or don't feed well into an assembly viewing software like EagleViewer/Consed.

                MOSAIK is our best bet right now, but we are having challenges getting it to run on our machine (64 bit vs 32 bit issues). Any other suggestions?

                Thanks!

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                7 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...