Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pageskipro
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 8

    training GlimmerHMM

    Can anyone advise me on training on GlimmerHMM. I have the manual and have executed the command for trainGlimmerHMM.

    I get an "error 34 no acceptor for training"

    Does anyone know how to resolve this error?

    Thanks!
  • ckuanglim
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 7

    #2
    Do you know about the parameter on running glimmerhmm?

    Comment

    • pageskipro
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks for your reply.

      I actually got this problem worked out. It has been a while so I can't remember the exact solution but if memory serves me I had a problem with my exon file that was used for the training. Once fixed the training was successful.

      Comment

      • ckuanglim
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 7

        #4
        In my case, I able to run trainGlimmerHMM successfully. Then use the trained directory with glimmerhmm. It has no problem on gene predicting.

        But I don't understand some of the parameter of glimmerhmm (such as -o -v -f). Can you explain the meaning?

        Comment

        • pageskipro
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 8

          #5
          Check out this link which explains Glimmer training options. I don't know the -o option and I don't see it in the table at the link below.
          glimmer,glimmerhmm, genefinder,genome,genomics,mummer,DNA, signatures, xhtml


          However the -v option explains that this the number of nucleotides that surround the gene coding regions ie, I assume this means at the 5' and 3' ends of the coding region for a gene and the -f option is a number for the average upstream UTR (untranslated region length) for a gene. I assume this means the 5' region of the gene.

          Comment

          • ckuanglim
            Junior Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 7

            #6
            Thanks for your reply. But the link only show the option for "trainGlimmerHMM".
            My question is actually on "glimmerhmm". The -o -v -f in "glimmerhmm" is different with "trainGlimmerHMM".

            Comment

            • pageskipro
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 8

              #7
              I used -v, -f and -g(creates a gff file) all with default values while running glimmer, so again I assume the options to train and to run are the same.

              Comment

              • sagarutturkar
                Member
                • Sep 2010
                • 61

                #8
                GlimmerHMM training

                I get the same error! Do you remember what was wrong with your exon file? My exon file looks like:

                contig_1 1299 1430
                contig_1 1773 1886

                contig_2 1263 1376

                contig_3 839 961

                Comment

                • sagarutturkar
                  Member
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 61

                  #9
                  Error 69

                  Originally posted by sagarutturkar View Post
                  I get the same error! Do you remember what was wrong with your exon file? My exon file looks like:

                  contig_1 1299 1430
                  contig_1 1773 1886

                  contig_2 1263 1376

                  contig_3 839 961
                  Well I was able to resolve the error. See details here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4643

                  However, I am getting error 69 which says /GlimmerHMM/train/score exited funny: 35584. Does anybody get same error and know how to resolve this?

                  Comment

                  • ersgupta
                    Member
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 26

                    #10
                    were you able to resolve the "score exited funny" error?

                    Originally posted by sagarutturkar View Post
                    Well I was able to resolve the error. See details here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4643

                    However, I am getting error 69 which says /GlimmerHMM/train/score exited funny: 35584. Does anybody get same error and know how to resolve this?

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • SEQadmin2
                      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                      ...
                      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                    • GATTACAT
                      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                      by GATTACAT
                      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                    0 responses
                    20 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                    0 responses
                    30 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                    0 responses
                    18 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                    0 responses
                    34 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...