Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • genome
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 3

    #1

    bowtie - invalid CIGAR string - wrong sam format

    Hi,

    I am trying to align short reads from Illumina with different aligners.

    I have used the same .fq files to align with BWA, Bowtie and Maq.

    BWA and Maq align without errors and give me the expected output files in the right format.

    But when I use the same fq and reference files to align with Bowtie, I get the following:

    My Command:

    bowtie --chunkmbs 100 -p 2 -X 500 prefixDB -1 /path/to/file/file_1.fq -2 /path/to/file/file_2.fq result.sam

    Result:

    # reads processed: xxx
    # reads with at least one reported alignment: yyy (57.06%)
    # reads that failed to align: zzz (42.94%)
    Reported aaa paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s)

    So that looks alright, but when I tried converting the resultant sam file to bam:

    samtools view -bS -o result.bam result.sam

    I get:

    [samopen] no @SQ lines in the header.
    [sam_read1] missing header? Abort!

    So I indexted the reference.fasta file and tried:

    samtools view -bt ref.fasta.fai result.sam > result.bam

    I get:

    [sam_header_read2] 1 sequences loaded.
    Parse error at line 1: invalid CIGAR character
    Aborted

    Now this is the first line of result.sam (the file I am trying to convert to bam)

    SRR034509.174/1 + NC_000913.2 1272036 GCACCACAGGCGTCGCCTATCGACTGCCAGAAGAGACGCTGGAGCAGGAACTAACCCTGTTGTGGAAGCGAGAGATGATTAATGGCTGTGTTTGTTTATCA IIII;III>-8II*II.IIIIII@II@:I.IIIIII567II?EI);>>DI,I?H0&7F8AB=*&.;F5';E.(0)2,?,44%$)%!&%#$&"$#$##%!#" 0 81:C>A,82:C>T,89:T>G,90:A>T,92:C>T,93:T>G,94:G>T,95:C>T,96:C>T,98:A>T,100:C>A

    All lines follow the same format, which I realize doesn't look the a typical .sam file format (it has missing fields) and I am wondering where I have gone wrong, and how I can correct this.

    Things to note:

    - I am running the latest bowtie and samtools version
    - My bowtie-build command on the reference.fasta has given me the right files as I have used them to align other .fq reads.
    - As mentioned previously, BWA and Maq worked fine with the same data so its very likely nothing is wrong with that.

    Thanks
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    That's not a .sam file. It's Bowtie native format. You need to add -S or --sam to the command line make the output .sam format.

    The "+" is the giveaway. SAM output has the bitwise flag, which is a number, in the second column of the output.

    Comment

    • genome
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
      That's not a .sam file. It's Bowtie native format. You need to add -S or --sam to the command line make the output .sam format.

      The "+" is the giveaway. SAM output has the bitwise flag, which is a number, in the second column of the output.
      :P thanku!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...