Hi all,
I've made a custom local BLAST database and I'm trying to 'combine' it with the BLAST nt database using ncbi-blast-2.9.0+ blastdb_aliastool but I'm getting the error:
"BLAST Database error: BLASTDB alias file creation failed. Some referenced files may be missing"
Here's what I've done:
In the directory nt, on our LINUX computing cluster, I've downloaded the most recent version of the BLAST nt database and unpacked it
$wget "ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/nt.??.tar.gz"
$for f in *.tar.gz; do tar -zxvf $f; rm $f; done
This completes with no errors and produces what seems to be the correct number of files (10 files for each nt.* part of the database, plus nt.nal, and taxdb.btd and taxdb.bti). All parts of the nt database are present (nt.00 to nt.85) and all these parts are listed in the nt.nal file.
Next, I make my local database:
I scp my fasta file and my taxid file to the nt folder, so everything is in the same folder.
$makeblastdb -in CocoaPESTLocal.fasta -parse_seqids -taxid_map CocoaPESTLocal_TaxonomyIDs.txt -blastdb_version 5 -title "Local database" -dbtype nucl -out loc
Output:
Building a new DB, current time: 12/24/2019 11:54:52
New DB name: /ddn/data/mdzm87/BLASTdatabases/nt
New DB title: Local database
Sequence type: Nucleotide
Keep MBits: T
Maximum file size: 1000000000B
Adding sequences from FASTA; added 44 sequences in 0.0142331 seconds.
And nine files are created.
Next, I try to 'combine' the databases using the blastdb_aliastool:
$blastdb_aliastool -dblist "loc nt" -dbtype nucl -out comb -title "Combined database"
BLAST Database error: BLASTDB alias file creation failed. Some referenced files may be missing
I also tried different variants of the command:
$blastdb_aliastool -dblist "loc nt.00 nt.01 nt.02 nt.03 nt.04 nt.05 nt.06 nt.07 nt.08 nt.09 nt.10 nt.11 nt.12 nt.13 nt.14 nt.15 nt.16 nt.17 nt.18 nt.19 nt.20 nt.21 nt.22 nt.23 nt.24 nt.25 nt.26 nt.27 nt.28 nt.29 nt.30 nt.31 nt.32 nt.33 nt.34 nt.35 nt.36 nt.37 nt.38 nt.39 nt.40 nt.41 nt.42 nt.43 nt.44 nt.45 nt.46 nt.47 nt.48 nt.49 nt.50 nt.51 nt.52 nt.53 nt.54 nt.55 nt.56 nt.57 nt.58 nt.59 nt.60 nt.61 nt.62 nt.63 nt.64 nt.65 nt.66 nt.67 nt.68 nt.69 nt.70 nt.71 nt.72 nt.73 nt.74 nt.75 nt.76 nt.77 nt.78 nt.79 nt.80 nt.81 nt.82 nt.83 nt.84 nt.85" -dbtype nucl -out comb -title "Combined database"
and
$blastdb_aliastool -dblist "loc nt.nal" -dbtype nucl -out comb -title "Combined database"
And get the same error.
However, if I make two copies of my local reference database (with different names loc and local)
$blastdb_aliastool -dblist "local loc" -dbtype nucl -out comb -title "Combined database"
Created nucleotide BLAST (alias) database comb with 88 sequences
So it seems to be something wrong specifically with trying to 'combine' the BLAST nt database specifically with my local database.
The only thing I notice is that the BLAST nt database has different names for some parts than my local database:
nt.00.nhd
nt.00.nhi
nt.00.nhr
nt.00.nin
nt.00.nnd
nt.00.nni
nt.00.nog
nt.00.nsd
nt.00.nsi
nt.00.nsq
....
loc.ndb
loc.nhr
loc.nin
loc.nog
loc.nos
loc.not
loc.nsq
loc.ntf
loc.nto
I've consulted the Blast+ manual and done lots of Googling but I can't seem to figure it out. Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Andreanna
-
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...05-22-2026, 06:42 AM -
Studying ecosystems means dealing with complex, multi-species communities that are hard to observe at scale. This complexity, however, hides many important questions to be answered, from how biogeochemical cycles work and how climate change can affect species distribution to how conservation strategies can work best.
Genomics, particularly since the expansion of NGS, has transformed ecosystem ecology. By sequencing environmental DNA, we can now assess biodiversity without direct...05-06-2026, 09:04 AM