Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frymor
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 151

    bowtie -m option

    Hi everybody,

    maybe I misunderstood it completely, but what is the option -m good for?
    If I am looking for differentially regulated genes in my data set and i set a high m-value (lets say 5), I know there are for some reads up to five different possible locations which they can be matched.

    @what exactly does it mean for my data?

    Do I have my read at different positions on the reference genome?
    This way my data for differentially expressed genes will be biased.
    Do I have these reads at five locations or there is just one, best location where it mapped to.

    I have pair-end data set, so I can't use the best and strata combination.
    @What I don't exactly understand is the definition of uniqueness in the bowtie -m option?

    If I use the option -m 1 I will loose a large part of my data, so I don't want to do it, but I would like to see, that the reads are mapped are as specific as possible.
    the command I use to run bowtie is as such:
    bowtie -a -m 5 -n 2 -l 22 -q --un total_trimmed.unmapped -t -p 2 -5 11 --chunkmbs 256 --max total_5trimmed.maxHits -S d_melanogaster_fb5_32 -1 s2_1_sequence.fq -2 s2_2_sequence.fq total_5trimmed.sam
  • waseem
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 11

    #2
    m 1, as I understood will give you the reads that map to only 1 location. (unique reads). My approach is, these reads are counted as true counts (given more weights). The reads mapping at multiple locations might be separated into reads mapping at alternatively spliced variants (different variants of same gene models) and the reads mapping to different genes (multi reads). I am working on separating these reads and counting them with different weights.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...