Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Autotroph
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 22

    #1

    kmer vs accuracy

    Hi,

    Given below is an explanation that i found for the different kmer size and its effect on sensitivity and specificity.

    "A smaller k-mer value allows locating more overlapping
    sequence (i.e. higher sensitivity) while increasing the number of ambiguous repeats(i.e. lower specificity). An extreme example for that is choosing a k-mer length of 3 or 5 where there will be only few possible high coverage k nucleotides with very low specificity. On the other hand, choosing a higher k-mer value has the opposite effect - it decreases sensitivity while increasing specificity.”

    From this i understand that an assembly at a higher kmer size is always more "accurate"(not talking about better N50) than the one at a lower kmer size. Is that correct(irrespective of the sequencing errors and polymorphism)?

    Could anybody explain how the accuracy of an assembly goes down with lower kmer size?

    Thanks
  • Thorondor
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 69

    #2
    yes that is mostly correct.

    just check out how brujin graph works, it's not hard to understand. Daniel Zerbinos phd thesis is helpful: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/training/ftp/P...el_Zerbino.pdf

    the larger the kmer the longer the overlap between two reads has to be. that's also a reason why the kmer can never be larger then your minimum read length.

    If you have a high coverage you can choose a higher kmer which will result in more reliable and accurate contigs.

    So with kmer size 6 you will have nodes like: AAGCTG, GGCTTA, CTCAAG... and of course there will be more overlaps (nodes need to ovlerap with kmer-1 bps to be contected in most algorithms) then with kmer size 35: AGTTGGCTAGAAACTGTACTAGTTTCGCGCATGCA and you will have less nodes therefore less RAM is needed.

    Comment

    • Autotroph
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 22

      #3
      Thanks Thorondor.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...