Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Autotroph
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 22

    kmer vs accuracy

    Hi,

    Given below is an explanation that i found for the different kmer size and its effect on sensitivity and specificity.

    "A smaller k-mer value allows locating more overlapping
    sequence (i.e. higher sensitivity) while increasing the number of ambiguous repeats(i.e. lower specificity). An extreme example for that is choosing a k-mer length of 3 or 5 where there will be only few possible high coverage k nucleotides with very low specificity. On the other hand, choosing a higher k-mer value has the opposite effect - it decreases sensitivity while increasing specificity.”

    From this i understand that an assembly at a higher kmer size is always more "accurate"(not talking about better N50) than the one at a lower kmer size. Is that correct(irrespective of the sequencing errors and polymorphism)?

    Could anybody explain how the accuracy of an assembly goes down with lower kmer size?

    Thanks
  • Thorondor
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 69

    #2
    yes that is mostly correct.

    just check out how brujin graph works, it's not hard to understand. Daniel Zerbinos phd thesis is helpful: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/training/ftp/P...el_Zerbino.pdf

    the larger the kmer the longer the overlap between two reads has to be. that's also a reason why the kmer can never be larger then your minimum read length.

    If you have a high coverage you can choose a higher kmer which will result in more reliable and accurate contigs.

    So with kmer size 6 you will have nodes like: AAGCTG, GGCTTA, CTCAAG... and of course there will be more overlaps (nodes need to ovlerap with kmer-1 bps to be contected in most algorithms) then with kmer size 35: AGTTGGCTAGAAACTGTACTAGTTTCGCGCATGCA and you will have less nodes therefore less RAM is needed.

    Comment

    • Autotroph
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 22

      #3
      Thanks Thorondor.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...