Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yy273826987
    Member
    • Mar 2020
    • 12

    #1

    Should I assemble samples from different locations together

    Dear all,

    Here I have a question about assembling shotgun metagenomics short reads (Illumina, paired-end reads, 2 x 150 bp).

    I have two drinking water pipelines in two cities. For each pipeline, I selected four different sites for sampling. At each site, I sampled water in the summer, fall, winter, and spring in 2017. I then processed the samples individually with the NGS and generated the short reads. I conducted the assembly with MEGAHIT for all my sample all at once:
    $ megahit -1 $R1s -2 $R2s

    I found that the final result has only one final.contigs.fa file instead of N contigs.fa files for N pairs of samples. It seems that MEGAHIT treats all my samples as a single group and assembles them together. Will this cause miss-assembly? For instance, read A from one sample and read B from another sample are merged to a contig because A and B are similar in sequence; however, read A and read B are actually from different bacterial species. Should this be a concern for my case? In other words, what would be the best strategy for assembling the reads from the two drinking water pipelines? Should I simply put all my samples together and assemble them all at once? Or, should I assemble the samples from the two water pipelines separately?

    Thanks a lot for any suggestions and comments.
  • yy273826987
    Member
    • Mar 2020
    • 12

    #2
    I now learned that, when you have multiple environmental samples and do the assembly all together, the process is called co-assembly. Co-assembly has it own advantages and disadvantages.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    32 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    50 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...