Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kasycas
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 22

    calling SNPs for prokaryotes

    Hi,

    I have genomic prokaryotic data and I want to look at SNPs between my data and the existing published data for very similar species. However, where MAQ worked well previously with Illumina data, I now have 454 reads and the BWA/samtools workflow with the pileup command seems to give information on different alleles where heterozygosity exists.

    Has anyone worked with 454 data from a prokaryote to call SNPs and how so?

    Thanks for the help!
  • nickloman
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 355

    #2
    I tend to use the gsMapper component of Newbler (supplied by Roche with the 454 instrument) for SNP calling.

    Comment

    • Kasycas
      Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 22

      #3
      Thanks Nickloman. I hadn't used this part of Newbler before. I'll check it out.

      Comment

      • Kasycas
        Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 22

        #4
        Back on this topic, is GATK ok to use for the detection of prokaryotic SNPs with Illumina data? A lot of the information I'm reading refers to human data so I'm just worried I'd use it incorrectly.

        The -D parameter worries me too as you need to specify a .rod file of which there seems only to be human versions...

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...