Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thias
    Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 45

    Splitting a FastQ file into two

    Hello folks,

    I happen to have a small problem which seemed to be trivial at first, but keeps me busy for a while now already. Maybe you can help...

    Problem:

    I need to split 615M paired reads currently in two FastQ files into two file pairs with 308M reads each.

    Solution attempt A:

    I unsuccessfully tried to use line count based tools like split or awk, but since newline characters occur in the quality scores, these tools respectively I screwed up badly.

    Solution attempt B:
    Code:
    bbmap/reformat.sh  in=...  in2=... out=... out2=... reads=308000000
    bbmap/reformat.sh  in=...  in2=... out=... out2=... skipreads=308000000
    resulted in


    Input is being processed as paired
    Input: 615307122 reads 91326404105 bases
    Output: 615307122 reads (100.00%) 91326404105 bases (100.00%)

    for the first command and in

    Input is being processed as paired
    Input: 615307122 reads 91326404105 bases
    Output: 0 reads (0.00%) 0 bases (0.00%)

    for the second command. Effectively those read commands seem to be ignored (BBMap Version 38.76).


    Solution attempt C:
    Code:
    famas --in=...  --in2=... --out=.XXXXXX.fq.gz  --out2=.XXXXXX.fq.gz  -x 308000000
    flooded the output directory with thousands of subfiles files (instead of the actually needed two files each) until the file system couldn't cope with the number of open files anymore and ran out of file descriptors (famas version 0.0.12).


    ERROR(famas.c|open_output_one:1056): Couldn't open =...compressed.065534.fq.gz
    ERROR(famas.c|main:1163): Couldn't open output files. Exiting...


    Since it took me a while to clean that mess up on the cluster again, I am somewhat reluctant to try out more now. Any ideas what I made wrong or suggestions which tools work better?

    Thanks a lot for reading and help!
    Thias
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Cross-posted and answered at: https://www.biostars.org/p/451453/

    Comment

    • Thias
      Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 45

      #3
      Indeed, the issue is solved by now using seqkit split2.

      My apologies for not indicating this here. I had posted here first but the thread was lingering in moderation for ~24h and thus I decided to ask for help on Biostars. It had not yet shown up when I got the answer on Biostars and I subsequently forgot to check back here. Thanks a lot to everyone none the less!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        Yesterday, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      110 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...