Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zack80.liu
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 9

    #1

    Percentage of mapped reads ?

    Hi all,

    I am new to the RNA seq world. I have processed bunch of illumina paired end reads. The reported alignment is only 49%.. I was wondering if this is normal. Here's the command and output. Thanks.

    bowtie -n 3 -p 10 --best -e 200 --trim5 15 --trim3 25 --sam BowtieIndexes/mm9 -1 Raw_files/sample-1_export.fq -2 sample-2_export.fq sample.sam


    # reads processed: 21482797
    # reads with at least one reported alignment: 10637665 (49.52%)
    # reads that failed to align: 10845132 (50.48%)
    Reported 10637665 paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s)
  • plassaaw
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 7

    #2
    If you could provide us with a little more information about the data you are analyzing that would be helpful. What are the reads from?
    I have had some samples that have had 90+% accuracy, but with things that are likely high in indels like cancer, I have gotten as low as 60ish %..

    Comment

    • zack80.liu
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 9

      #3
      This is a mouse cancer dataset. However not a lot indels are expected. Some of the samples are normal controls. Any more information needed?

      Comment

      • plassaaw
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 7

        #4
        That's fairly low then. Try rerunning a set of the samples instead of as paired-end, as separate single reads. Also, try trimming less off of the reads, because there is a possibility that that decreases the number of possible locations for the paired ends to match up.

        Let me know the results.

        Comment

        • Jon_Keats
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 279

          #5
          If you are analyzing RNAseq data why are you using bowtie and not tophat? Your percent aligned will be low with bowtie alone as only reads aligning to an exons will map, while all reads crossing a exon-exon junction will not align. Depending on the read length this can be a large percentage or your reads.

          Comment

          • zack80.liu
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 9

            #6
            Plassaaw,

            I used mm9_with_junctions index which supposedly takes care of the exon-exon junctions .

            When I run single reads on these two paired_end reads _1 and _2, 80% and 78% of the reads are aligned.

            However, when I run paired-end alignment, only 50% of the reads are aligned... Any idea?



            # reads processed: 21482797
            # reads with at least one reported alignment: 17370381 (80.86%)
            # reads that failed to align: 4112416 (19.14%)
            Reported 17370381 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

            Comment

            • zack80.liu
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2011
              • 9

              #7
              single read mapping can reach 80%

              # reads processed: 34439174
              # reads with at least one reported alignment: 27167675 (78.89%)
              # reads that failed to align: 7271499 (21.11%)

              Well paired mapping is only 52%

              Any idea? Thanks!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Today, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              68 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...