Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MolecularToast
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 9

    #1

    Bfast index splitting and appropriate hash width

    I am creating colorspace reference indexes with bfast and need to split them using the "-d" argument (only 16GB of RAM). Something like this:

    $BFAST/bfast index -f $REF -m 1111111111111111111111 -d 1 -w $HASHWIDTH -i $INDEXNUMBER -A 1 -n $CORES -T $TMP_DIR

    In the Bfast manual it states that the hash width ("- w") should be reduced from 14 if splitting indexes but I cannot find where it mentions what value should be used.

    Page 57: We suggest a hash width of 14, although this should be reduced if you are splitting the indexes for low-memory computation.

    I am only planning on splitting into 4 ("-d 1"). Does anyone know what is the most appropriate hash width for this setting? Is there a defined relationship between key size, key width, or another metric and hash width?

    I appreciate any assistance.
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    You should be fine keeping the hash width the same. See the BFAST paper's supplemental materials for the full details.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...