Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tylerdodgeball
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2020
    • 2

    pipeline to construct alt contigs from reference contigs?

    Dear all,

    I am working with a genome with very low heterozygosity. I suspect that this monoploid genome (which only includes reference contigs in its fasta file) is actually tetraploid (multiple independent analyses of SNPs confirm this suspicion).

    As a first step towards testing whether different alleles of the same gene have different expression levels, I would like to map my RNA-seq reads to the reference contigs, and also to a separate set of "alt" contigs that are identical to the reference contigs, but which include the SNP variants. The idea is to separate, into two separate Bam files, the RNA reads exactly matching the reference genome from the RNA reads exactly matching the alternative SNPs.

    Is there a straightforward way to take one's fasta file for the reference contigs, along with a BAM file (made from mapping Illumina DNA reads back to the reference contigs), to call the SNPs with some stringent filtering, and then to generate a new fasta file for "alt contigs" (the contigs with SNP variants)? Although this would give no idea as to the phasing, I think it would be okay in the case of my genome for purposes of looking at differential RNA-seq, because the SNPs are pretty far apart, and generally there are only two alleles per gene.

    Thank you for any suggestions you may have.

    Best regards,

    TylerDodgeball
  • tylerdodgeball
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2020
    • 2

    #2
    I have found this utility, which seems to have the same functionality, without the need to make the alt contigs:

    Sequencing reads overlapping polymorphic sites in diploid mammalian genomes may be assigned to one allele or the other. This holds the potential to detect gene expression, chromatin modifications, DNA methylation or nuclear interactions in an ...

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    10 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    45 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    105 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    125 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...