Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rachelly
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 37

    RIP-seq analysis

    Hi all,

    I want to analyze data from a RIP-seq experiment (an IP of a protein that binds to mRNAs).
    Can I use MACS for this (not forgetting to change the bandwidth, slocal and llocal accordingly)? Are there any problems or biases for using it for this assay (RNA instead of DNA, longer peaks, etc.)?

    Is there another analysis tool for RIP-seq ?

    Thanks,
    Rachelly.
    Last edited by Rachelly; 03-08-2011, 12:38 AM. Reason: -
  • Rachelly
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 37

    #2
    After more thinking - strand data is not preserved in an RNA protocol (unless a special process is done). So using MACS is not possible.
    Another idea is to compare normalized counts for genome features (similar to RNAseq).

    Any other thoughts?

    Comment

    • tboothby
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 56

      #3
      Hi Rachelly,

      I am interested in doing some RIP-seq experiments. Do you have any advice from your experiences?

      I know that RIP is supposed to produce a lot of background, did you encounter this problem. What sort of controls did you use?

      Cheers,
      T

      Comment

      • Dario1984
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 166

        #4
        You will also need to run an RNA-seq library and use that to account for high expressed genes, because the same genes usually show up at the top of every RIP-seq experiment, no matter which antibody you use. In other words, I'm confident you will get lots of reads for GAPDH.

        There is a new tool that is going to be published soon, from what the author tells me. It's abstract A50.

        Comment

        • Rachelly
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 37

          #5
          Hi tboothby,

          What I did in that project, is use an RNA-Seq analysis to compare the results of two experiments. I compared both FPKM values and raw counts of the two samples.

          I think it was enough for that specific project, since we wanted to compare binding of whole mRNAs transcripts (rather than short binding sites, as it is in regular Chip-Seq).

          I haven't had anymore experience with RIP-Seq since.
          I'd be happy to hear other people's thoughts.

          Cheers,
          Rachelly.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...