Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Morpse
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 2

    #1

    bcftools error

    Hello,

    The command
    cat all.mpileup | bcftools view -bvcg - > all.var.raw.bcf

    exits with the text below
    [bcf_sync] incorrect number of fields (4 != 5) at 10:1696253
    [afs] 0:38509.883 1:50.388 2:38.729

    before exiting it outputs this text (this pattern starts at 100000)
    [bcfview] 13600000 sites processed.
    [afs] 0:99814.004 1:101.247 2:84.750
    [bcfview] 13700000 sites processed.
    [afs] 0:99786.086 1:107.189 2:106.725

    all.mpileup was generated with the following command
    samtools -verbose -uf reference.fasta all.bam > all.mpileup

    Does anyone know what is causing this or how to fix it? I would like to be able to call both SNPs and indels with this.

    Thank you
    Last edited by Morpse; 03-11-2011, 11:16 AM. Reason: typo
  • Hkins552
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 18

    #2
    Same problem

    I am having the same problem, which is strange as I've used this exact pipeline/command previously with no issues. Have you figured anything out?

    Comment

    • swbarnes2
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 910

      #3
      The "incorrect number of files" can happen if the file is truncated. I see it sometimes if I want to check on a big files while it's still being made by mpileup.

      What's the purpose of the cat command, and the pipe?

      Comment

      • Mark.hz
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 18

        #4
        I ran into the same problem, either with or without nohup. Does anyone know how to fix? Now I am generating the raw bcf file and try to figure out what is wrong on that specific line.

        Comment

        • Mark.hz
          Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 18

          #5
          Still have this problem when doing bcftools view for a bcf file (mpileup generated): [bcf_sync] incorrect number of fields (6 != 5) at 7:1396330564
          Any help?

          Comment

          • figo1019
            Member
            • Jun 2012
            • 32

            #6
            Originally posted by Mark.hz View Post
            Still have this problem when doing bcftools view for a bcf file (mpileup generated): [bcf_sync] incorrect number of fields (6 != 5) at 7:1396330564
            Any help?
            Hi Mark.hz

            Have you sorted out this problem as I am also facing the similar error while running the bcf file [bcf_sync] incorrect number of fields (4 != 5) at 15:16294867.

            Regards

            Comment

            • Mark.hz
              Member
              • Mar 2009
              • 18

              #7
              Originally posted by figo1019 View Post
              Hi Mark.hz

              Have you sorted out this problem as I am also facing the similar error while running the bcf file [bcf_sync] incorrect number of fields (4 != 5) at 15:16294867.

              Regards
              Truncated BAM file may cause this problem. You need to go back to validate your BAM files by Picard.

              Comment

              • figo1019
                Member
                • Jun 2012
                • 32

                #8
                Originally posted by Mark.hz View Post
                Truncated BAM file may cause this problem. You need to go back to validate your BAM files by Picard.
                Thank you for your reply

                I ran the picard tool to validate I get an error
                ERROR: Read groups is empty

                Rest things are OK.

                Does it make a huge difference ?

                regards

                Comment

                • Mark.hz
                  Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 18

                  #9
                  Originally posted by figo1019 View Post
                  Thank you for your reply

                  I ran the picard tool to validate I get an error
                  ERROR: Read groups is empty

                  Rest things are OK.

                  Does it make a huge difference ?

                  regards
                  Strange. I don't think RG is the reason. Did the validation stop at the 1st error?

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                    by SEQadmin2



                    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                    ...
                    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                    ...
                    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
                  0 responses
                  16 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
                  0 responses
                  32 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
                  0 responses
                  42 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                  0 responses
                  26 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...