Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Trudy
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 16

    calibrated quality string "B" full

    Hello everybody!

    I have a question about the calibrated quality string in qseq.txt file.

    If I have full called sequence BUT a calibrated quality string full of “B” and the read passes the filtering (1), I should discard this read (although passed the filter)?

    And if I have two reads in which the first read didn’t passed the filter while the second read passed BUT the number of “B” within is similar,
    which read should I discard? Otherwise I could cut the read after “B” appeared?

    In a few words, how I must to consider the “B” score for the next anlysis??
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    Are you aware that trailing "B" qualities can have a special meaning - The Read Segment Quality Control Indicator? See this thread:
    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc


    I would therefore trim off any trailing bases with a "B" quality, e.g.

    Comment

    • tomc
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 29

      #3
      If it helps, here is a shell script to truncate reads at the first B score


      fastq_trim_B.awk

      Code:
      #! /usr/bin/nawk -f
      # tomc  
      # trim trailing 'B' scores (and sequence) from Ilumina FastQ reads
      
      /^@.*/     {FQ["DL"]=$0; next}
      /^[ACTGN]/ {FQ["SQ"]=$0; next}
      /^\+.*/    {FQ["QL"]=$0; next}
      /^[B-h]/   {
        n=match($0,/B/);
        if(n) {n--} else {n=length($0)};
        printf("%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n",
      	FQ["DL"],substr(FQ["SQ"],1,n),
      	FQ["QL"],substr($0,1,n));
        next
      }

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...