Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    multiple gbk file

    Hi,

    Is it possible to merge multiple gbk file. I've one gbk per chromosome and I want to have one gbk file for the whome genome (it's for Bos Taurus for info )

    Thanks,

    N.
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #2
    Standard Genbank format requires a line with just // between entries (which your entries should end with), but whether the tools you are using will handle that can only be found by testing.

    Comment

    • kokonech
      Curious Character
      • Sep 2010
      • 13

      #3
      You can use UGENE extension Workflow Designer.

      I've attached a workflow schema that allows to input multiple genbank files and merge them into single one.

      Install UGENE and open the schema file. Then set input parameters for Read Sequence element - it would be your multiple files. Don't use iterations, since you don't need any specific behavior for each file. Finally set output file for Write Genbank element and run schema.

      Hope that helps,
      Konstantin
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #4
        Originally posted by NicoBxl View Post
        Hi,

        Is it possible to merge multiple gbk file. I've one gbk per chromosome and I want to have one gbk file for the whome genome (it's for Bos Taurus for info )

        Thanks,

        N.
        Yes, but as krobison said, some tools will only expect one record per file.

        The easiest way to do this at the command line is with the cat command. e.g.

        Code:
        cat file1.gbk file2.gbk file3.gbk > merged.gbk

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...