Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mdeng
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 4

    Comparing Solid Data

    Hi Folks,

    I am quite new at Bioinformatics. I just know the really basics like NW, SW, GOTOH, cluster analysis, SVM, etc.
    Usually I am a regular computer scientist, with a bit of bioinformatics background.
    I was asked to perform some calculations.
    I have got sequenced data from:
    - FFPE Tumor
    - FFPE Normal
    - Frozen Tumor

    Our interest is to get some information about the data. We want to get a similarity score, that tells us, how similar the datasets are to each other.

    All the Data we have got are reads from Exoms in .tsv files.

    Maybe some of you have got some hints to get startet or some infos about tools and workflows.

    With best,

    Mario

    P.S. I Attached the first two lines of one .tsv file, maybe its usefull.
    Attached Files
  • deksta
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 1

    #2
    De-novo alignments

    Hi Mario,

    I just sent you a message about FFPE samples because I've beet trying to sequence them for a while for use on Solids...

    It seems to me that some kind of de-novo alignment is needed for all the samples. I'm assuming they are all from the same person? I'm not sure what packages can handle NGS scale data.

    dex*

    Comment

    • mdeng
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 4

      #3
      Ok,

      thank you. Anybody else an Idea?

      Comment

      • mdeng
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 4

        #4
        Allright,

        now we got a first Idea:
        We want to compare FFPE normal to hg19 and try to get a similarity score. If FFPE normal has high similarity to hg19, we will use FFPE as reference.
        After that, compare the other samples.

        Notes, memos, ideas are welcome.

        With best from GER.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...