Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zhlu1986
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 4

    how to caculate coverage

    I have assembled reads to contigs and then map it to referece.
    I got a sam file.
    How to caculate the coverage of it?

    I want to caculate the rate, for example:
    the length of reference is 10000bp
    the length of reads mapped reagion is 2000bp in all
    and the coverage rate is 20%

    Is there any script or software?
    Thank you all.
    Last edited by zhlu1986; 04-13-2011, 01:38 AM. Reason: previous one is not clear enough
  • boetsie
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 245

    #2
    Have a look at my older thread, it might help you;

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

    Comment

    • zhlu1986
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 4

      #3
      Thank you, boetsie.
      But my purpose is different from you .
      I want to caculate the rate, for example:
      the length of reference is 10000bp
      the length of reads mapped reagion is 2000bp in all
      and the coverage rate is 20%

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #4
        Do you want the percentage of the reference covered by at least one read?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          Yesterday, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...