Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • honey
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 151

    control and test in DE in RNA-seq

    I have been analyzing the mRNA-seq data using Cuffdiff and has two questions:

    1. In case of Differential expression analyis between a control vs test sample, ln fold change is represented as Value2/ Value1 as per the manual of Cufflink. I was wondering Value 1 should be control while Value 2 should be test sample.
    From Cufflink manual:
    FPKMx 8.01089 FPKM of the gene in sample x
    FPKMy 8.551545 FPKM of the gene in sample y
    ln(FPKMy/FPKMx) 0.06531 The natural log of the fold change y/x

    2. In typical control vs test sample based on Hg19 reference annotation- I get around 36K transcripts (total including no test and test OK) that seems to be little less as expected. Does it seem to be right number?

    3. When I combine/ filter combined GTF file with any of isoform.exp file I get
    RIC8A chr11:202907-236320 OK chr11 207163 208938 exon 1
    RIC8A chr11:202907-236320 OK chr11 209271 209318 exon 2
    RIC8A chr11:202907-236320 OK chr11 209407 210000 exon 5

    Here the combined GTF provide a location (in red) Chr11 202907-236320 while cufdiff provide exon spanning 207163 208938. What is the first location refer to It is referring to neither gene location nor longest transcript. Any suggestion please.
    Thanks
    Last edited by honey; 04-18-2011, 09:56 PM.
  • honey
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 151

    #2
    Question

    Any suggestion please.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...