Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • madsaan
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 26

    same xloc id but different tcons id with same exons

    Hello,

    I am trying to find differentially expressed genes bteween two samples and looked at the cuffcompare.combined.gtf file and noticed the following

    chr9 Cufflinks exon 18970198 18970476 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "1"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19048355 19048421 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "2"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19058189 19058237 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "3"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19058815 19058928 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "4"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19060579 19060698 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "5"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19061925 19062041 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "6"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19062708 19062759 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "7"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19064835 19064962 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "8"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19066041 19066118 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "9"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19067507 19067646 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "10"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19075231 19075250 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00002983"; exon_number "11"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.26568.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1239";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19048370 19048421 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "1"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19058189 19058237 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "2"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19058815 19058928 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "3"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19060579 19060698 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "4"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19061925 19062041 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "5"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19062708 19062759 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "6"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19064835 19064962 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "7"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19066041 19066118 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "8"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19067507 19067646 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "9"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19075231 19075276 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "10"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";
    chr9 Cufflinks exon 19081324 19081659 . + . gene_id "XLOC_001684"; transcript_id "TCONS_00004682"; exon_number "11"; gene_name "ENSCAFG00000010758"; oId "gonad.30133.1"; nearest_ref "ENSCAFT00000017124"; class_code "c"; tss_id "TSS1240";

    Why am I getting different TCONS ids when the exon numbers are the same?

    Thanks,
    Joji
  • hchang10
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 13

    #2
    I noticed this too. If anyone could explain the differences between XLOC (gene id) and TCONS (transcript id), I'll really appreciate.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...