Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nseh
    Junior Member
    • May 2011
    • 3

    Problems with Picards MarkDuplicates

    Hi all,

    When running Picards MarkDuplicates I get the following error:

    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: SAM validation error: ERROR: Record 124760536, Read name B80PDAABXX:1:26
    :2364:123720#0, MAPQ should be 0 for unmapped read.
    at net.sf.samtools.SAMUtils.processValidationErrors(SAMUtils.java:334)
    at net.sf.samtools.BAMFileReader$BAMFileIterator.advance(BAMFileReader.java:469)
    at net.sf.samtools.BAMFileReader$BAMFileIterator.next(BAMFileReader.java:450)
    at net.sf.samtools.BAMFileReader$BAMFileIterator.next(BAMFileReader.java:417)
    at net.sf.samtools.SAMFileReader$AssertableIterator.next(SAMFileReader.java:629)
    at net.sf.samtools.SAMFileReader$AssertableIterator.next(SAMFileReader.java:607)
    at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.buildSortedReadEndLists(MarkDuplicates.java:276)
    at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.doWork(MarkDuplicates.java:113)
    at net.sf.picard.cmdline.CommandLineProgram.instanceMain(CommandLineProgram.java:158)
    at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.main(MarkDuplicates.java:97)

    It says that MAPQ should be 0 for unmapped reads, and this sounds reasonable. But could it be that something went wrong earlier in the analysis? Hope anyone can help!

    Nat.
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    This is a common problem, and you'll run into it with all the Picard suite of tools.

    There's a setting that goes something like VALIDATION_STRINGENCY, and if you set it to LENIENT, it will complain about those reads, but it won't stop on them.

    This happens with bwa, because it concatenates reference sequence, which leads to slightly odd things happening when a read aligns over the overlap. So this might be the source of your problem. Regardless of what's causing it, you can examine the problem reads, and cut them out, or change the stringency to let them go through.

    Comment

    • nseh
      Junior Member
      • May 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Thank you! It works

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...