Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MatthewVC
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 11

    Pileup loosing consensus sequence?

    Hello,

    I am doing a project involving re-sequencing mitochondrial genomes and am having some trouble with the SAM Tools pileup function in Galaxy.

    Using Galaxy, I am mapping my Illumina reads onto a FASTA copy of the mitochondrial genome using BWA. This is to avoid my reads inappropriately being mapped onto the numerous places in the nuclear genome where fragments of the mitochondrial genome have integrated. This improves my coverage considerably (from roughly 50X when mapping reads to entire genome to 4000+ when mapping only to the mtDNA).

    However, when I generate a pileup from the .bam file, the third column, which should have the consensus sequence, consists entirely of “N”s. This is preventing me from continuing with the bioinformatic analysis.

    I wanted to see if anyone could offer any suggestions as to why my consensus sequence is lost.

    Thanks,
    Matt
  • MatthewVC
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 11

    #2
    I figured it out a few minutes after posting this. I had used the "build in" reference genome when generating the pileup file instead of using the reference from my history that had also been used to map the reads. I guess I was too quick to post.

    Matt

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...