Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • avi
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 7

    #1

    Missing Junctions in Tophat! ( after providing a known junctions & gene models files)

    I am using Tophat for aligning unpaired RNAseq reads (36 bases each) and I had a question about junction calling in Tophat. I tried running Tophat with both -j (a known junctions file from Ensembl) and -G (known gene model annotations file from Ensembl) and also ran Cufflinks on the results.

    In both of the runs, if I compare the results with the actual known transcripts from Ensembl, it seems like I am missing many known junctions.

    To Illustrate, say if Ensembl has a Transcript with say 5 exons. Cufflinks annotates the same region as containing 3 transcripts (Exon 1-2 as Transcript 1, Exon 3-4 as Transcript 2 and Exon 5 as Transcript 3).

    If I have understood the paper correctly, this is because even though Tophat has the coordinates of the known junctions it didn't find enough IUM reads spanning those particular junctions (under the given parameters) to allow it to call it junction? Is that correct..?

    Under that assumption, I tried running Tophat with --min-anchor-length = 5 (reduced from default 8) and --min-isoform-fraction 0.1 (reduced from default 0.1). But I didn't get any improvement in finding more junctions. (The junctions.bed file has the exact same number of lines)

    Does anyone have any suggestions on what else I can try to improve junction calling?

    Also, given the Genomic coordinates of a splice junction, is there a way I can extract, from the Tophat output, the no of IUM (Initially Unmapped reads) that Tophat mapped to span that particular junction?

    thanks,

    Avinash
  • shurjo
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 132

    #2
    Hi Avinash,

    In both of the runs, if I compare the results with the actual known transcripts from Ensembl, it seems like I am missing many known junctions.
    For any one tissue type, a certain (possibly substantial) fraction of the known junctions will not be present simply due to tissue-specific expression of different isoforms. As such, I wouldn't worry about this part of your question.

    Also, given the Genomic coordinates of a splice junction, is there a way I can extract, from the Tophat output, the no of IUM (Initially Unmapped reads) that Tophat mapped to span that particular junction?
    I doubt this is possible, unless you are MUCH better than hacking into the code and the tmp files than I am.

    Best of luck,

    Shurjo

    Comment

    • agent99
      Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 10

      #3
      You could try reducing the segment-length to 1/2 of your read length. I believe that you do not get any mapped splice junctions if your segment-length is greater than 1/2 the read length.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        Today, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      76 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...