Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • theward
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 6

    Library quantification for pooling question

    Hi,

    I was wondering if anyone had any success with accurately quantifying libraries for pooling other than using the Qubit? I was wanting to make the process alot more high-throughput. Has anyone successfully used the Agilent Tapestion for this?

    Thanks
  • rflrob
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 50

    #2
    Our facility (VCGSL at UC Berkeley) uses the Kapa qPCR kit, and we tend to get really even distributions.

    Comment

    • kwaraska
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 131

      #3
      our Quant

      We use a homebrew that is essentially the Kapa kit but using PhiX as the standard for the standard curve.

      We found the Kapa kit to be cost prohibitive but are looking into the new Qiagen Quant kit now

      Comment

      • ryclone
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2012
        • 2

        #4
        Originally posted by kwaraska View Post
        We use a homebrew that is essentially the Kapa kit but using PhiX as the standard for the standard curve.

        We found the Kapa kit to be cost prohibitive but are looking into the new Qiagen Quant kit now
        Hey kwaraska, our facility also is currently using Kapa for library quantification and while it works great I would very much like to move toward a less expensive alternative. Are there any special tricks to using PhiX as a standard? Would you mind sending me your protocols? Thanks.

        ryclone

        Comment

        • kwaraska
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 131

          #5
          I can send you our "by hand" protocol.

          The robotic one isn't as easy to translate into "by hand"

          If you give me an email address I'd be happy to share

          Comment

          • ryclone
            Junior Member
            • Aug 2012
            • 2

            #6
            Originally posted by kwaraska View Post
            I can send you our "by hand" protocol.

            The robotic one isn't as easy to translate into "by hand"

            If you give me an email address I'd be happy to share
            Thank you very much! The email address is [email protected]

            Comment

            • yun.zhao
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 2

              #7
              Kapa qPCR kit is good. But I usually qualify each lane's samples by Qubit then pool together then run Qpcr
              it save some time and works fine.
              Yun

              Comment

              • kwaraska
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 131

                #8
                Pooling prior to qPCR is fine if you aren't super interested in exact pooling. Most of our customers would prefer to pay a bit extra for additional qPCR rather than take a chance on getting only 10% of one sample when they expect 25%. It is cheaper to pool after qPCR than run another whole lane of sequencing to get more data

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                53 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...