Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gvoisin
    Junior Member
    • May 2011
    • 3

    Bioconductor/R workshop for high-throughput data analysis (web version)

    Hello,

    Boasting a large collection of software for the analysis of biological data, Bioconductor and R are invaluable tools for data management, pipeline production, and analysis.
    To help biologists tackle the challenge of understanding and learning how to use these tools, BSC is offering an online workshop on the analysis of high-throughput data, with an emphasis on microarray and next generation sequencing technologies.

    To learn more, visit us at



    The BSC team
  • danielecook
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 8

    #2
    Hi -

    I've got a question regarding using Bioconductor. I've been struggling with Bioconductor for the past week - I was under the impression that Bioconductor could be used for 'high-throughput' analysis on large files (500MB+) without any trouble on my laptop.

    Specifically - I am trying to do ChIP-seq analysis on a genome wide scale. Unfortunately, I haven't even been able to get the files to load. R tries to load them in their entirely into RAM - I guess I thought it would work with the files without necessarily loading them into memory.

    What strategies do people use to work with large files in Bioconductor? Is there some major thing I am missing here?

    Thanks!
    Dan

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      R does have the unfortunate habit of trying to load large files into RAM. If you're trying to load the raw sequences or even the full BAM file then you're going to have problems. Process all of the reads outside of R (also, call peaks there). Just load the peaks into R as this file should be much more manageable for you.

      BTW, in the future you might get a little better feedback if you stated exactly what's not working well. What are you trying to load and how big is it? How much RAM do you have? You won't get far if you don't give people the information they need to help you.
      Last edited by dpryan; 10-12-2013, 03:21 PM.

      Comment

      • gvoisin
        Junior Member
        • May 2011
        • 3

        #4
        Hi, Personnally, with a I7 intel + 8 Gig in Memory, I'm able to perform analysis for large microarray data.
        But, i think that , with the high throughput data like NGS data, you need to server with many nodes + many Gig for the ram. It's not possible to process them with your laptop. the HT data needs High level tools.
        Hence, amazon server is one solution, or in your instistution ,you have, may be, a compute "grapp" , composed of many nodes and RAM.

        My strategie, I run my code on a server for the greedy step. like algnment .., I save the R object, I load on my personnal computer to go on my analysis. Normally, all analysis could be processed on a server but with the task ordonnancor ( i'm not sure of this terms in english), you have some constraints

        When you have a big data, think a big computer. you loss your times to process your data on your computer. Moreover, the time machine is not expensive ( if you compared to the price to generate the HT data )

        Comment

        • danielecook
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2013
          • 8

          #5
          Thanks for the tips

          I appreciate the feedback. We do have a supercomputer here I can make use of, and I do have some experience with Amazon in the cloud.

          Actually - the data I am working with is already aligned (it's bed files).

          I think my plan of attack here then will be to call peaks outside of R and then split up the bed file into individual chromosomes for the purposes of visualizing peaks (with Gviz) along with other tracks of interest. Does this workflow similar to anything anyone else has done? I really appreciate your responses.

          Thanks so much!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...