Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sulicon
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 41

    Cheapest solution for targeted sequencing?

    Hi,

    We have 500-1000 genomic DNA samples and we are interested in a set of ~20 loci. What's the most affordable way to sequence the 20 loci for all the samples?

    Thanks,
    Shuli
  • ulz_peter
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 219

    #2
    If it's only 20 Loci I would do PCR and Amplicon sequencing. (Well, depends on the size of the Loci). You could use multipliex identifiers of any length which you incorporate into the amplification primer. With that amount of samples you could also think about a multiplex PCR amplifying 10 or even 20 PCR products in one reaction: that would lead to one PCR per sample targetted sequencing: I don't think anyone can do it cheaper...

    Comment

    • rocksd
      Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 14

      #3
      Originally posted by sulicon View Post
      Hi,

      We have 500-1000 genomic DNA samples and we are interested in a set of ~20 loci. What's the most affordable way to sequence the 20 loci for all the samples?

      Thanks,
      Shuli
      How long (bp) are those loci? If it is short enough, I'd say perform multiplex PCR using primers embedded with nextgen adaptors. In this case, sample prep cost may be significantly lower. You can multiplex many samples to control sequencing cost (sequencing reagents and materials), depending on the size of the loci. But the library prep may be too much a burden if you follow Illumina's gDNA library protocol for 500-1000 samples. On the other hand, if you can generate enough amplicons with Adaptors attached already, it will be a lot less work.

      I am dealing with a similar request from another client. If you wish to discuss a little more on this topic, you can send me a personal message.

      Rocksd

      Comment

      • stanford_genome_tech
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 7

        #4
        Hi all,

        Stanford Genome Technology has published a 2nd generation "open source" capture technology using in solution oligonucleotides.

        We have an in silico design covering the CCDS genes (most of the exome) release and will have one covering the majority of the genome out soon (under review). You can download oligo sequences and create your own capture assays.





        More completely new third generation targeting technologies coming soon in a Nature journal. Be on the look out for it shortly.

        SGTC sequencing techies

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...