Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hunakos
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 1

    Gene expression + RNAPol II ChIPSeq

    Hello Everybody,

    I'm new in this field, so I might have a very naive / simple question:

    Can I study gene expression level changes by comparing two or more RNA POL II Chipseq datasets? For example: treated vs non-treated?
    (I know that the RNA-seq would be the best tool, but i have onlw ChIPseq datasets...)

    If yes, could anybody suggest me a tool to compare datasets, and to find candidate genes that shows alteration in expression levels?

    It would be a great help.

    Regards
  • mudshark
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 138

    #2
    I would not recommend to use the RNA Pol ChiPSeq data for many reasons:

    a) the precision of ChIPSeq for quantification of extended feature enrichments (as expected for RNA Pol II) is very bad given the current data analysis procedures

    b) you need very deep sequencing to get good RNA Pol signals on the body of weakly expressed genes (I hope you kind of normalize to input as the input reads are a function of gene expression as well, i.e. more expression, more control reads).

    c) the Pol II binding - RNA level correlation depends on which isoform of Pol (S2ph, S5ph, all Pol) you measure and where you actually calculate the enrichment (promoter, body). Promoter peaks might not well indicate the true RNA production (stalled Polymerases)

    d) you will need a serious amount of replicates, do you have those?

    I strongly doubt that you will get a robust expression estimate. Maybe you will be able to detect dramatic expression changes, but I guess most of the differentially expressed genes you will miss. if you just want some candidates you might, however, try.

    why not do an - watch out - expression microarray
    seriously, they work, they are highly validated, analysis procedures are calibrated using reference data sets and if you do not need alternative splicing and stuff they are a true option.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    45 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    105 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    125 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...