Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wingtec
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 35

    RNA-Seq on MiSeq

    Hi All,

    Can you the experienced comment the use of MiSeq in doing RNA-Seq? Is the number of reads with MiSeq too little for RNA-Seq, esp for a big genome such as human? And, do people usually do Paired-end or single-end for RNA-Seq?

    Thanks much,

    Wingtec
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    Even with the upgrade I think you will get only 12 million reads, without it you get like 6 million.

    This is only enough for micro-RNA-Seq which you could muliplex highly though.

    Comment

    • ScottC
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 244

      #3
      Isnt the new machine supposed to produce 7Gb for a 2x150b run? Doesn't that make it 7Gb/150b/2 reads = 23.3M clusters?

      Comment

      • protist
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 101

        #4
        12 million reads is enough for bacteria and small euks..

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          Originally posted by ScottC View Post
          Isnt the new machine supposed to produce 7Gb for a 2x150b run? Doesn't that make it 7Gb/150b/2 reads = 23.3M clusters?
          The 7Gb number mostly results from the increased read length, 2x250 so 7Gb/250bp/2 = 14M clusters.

          Comment

          • ScottC
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 244

            #6
            Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
            The 7Gb number mostly results from the increased read length, 2x250 so 7Gb/250bp/2 = 14M clusters.
            Oh yes, of course, I forgot the 250b improvement.

            Cheers,

            Scott.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            53 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...