Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xyzzy123
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 15

    #16
    I had guessed that January's drop was connected to Illumina's announcement in the same month, so was surprised that it reversed in April.

    Comment

    • AllSeq
      Registered Vendor
      • Oct 2013
      • 138

      #17
      Originally posted by xyzzy123 View Post
      I had guessed that January's drop was connected to Illumina's announcement in the same month, so was surprised that it reversed in April.
      My guess (and it's really just a guess) is that they are ignoring the X Ten in figuring the prices. Illumina has been raising prices on their sequencing kits every April 1st, so that little bump makes sense. However, I'm not sure that they're taking into account the release of the v4 chemistry for the HiSeq 2500. That reduced the list price for 1Gb of sequence from $43 down to $29. (For comparison, it's just $7/Gb for the HiSeq X.)
      AllSeq - The Sequencing Marketplace
      [email protected]
      www.AllSeq.com

      Comment

      • xyzzy123
        Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 15

        #18
        https://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/ is no longer being updated. It looks like they hit the end of the graph and don't want to extend it. In any case, since the price is now dropping much more _slowly_ than Moore's Law, in another 10 years or so at this rate Moore's Law will catch up and the graph would look kind of silly.

        Comment

        • xyzzy123
          Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 15

          #19
          NOW there's finally a sizable drop.

          Estimated cost of sequencing the human genome over time since the Human Genome Project.


          The last two entries in the .xlsx file show a cost per genome of $4,211 on Apr. 15 and $1,363 on Jul. 15. I guess they decided to take the X Ten into account.

          Comment

          • Brian Bushnell
            Super Moderator
            • Jan 2014
            • 2709

            #20
            Due to all the artificial limitations on the X10, I don't consider it an accurate reflection of real sequencing costs.

            Comment

            • westerman
              Rick Westerman
              • Jun 2008
              • 1104

              #21
              Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
              Due to all the artificial limitations on the X10, I don't consider it an accurate reflection of real sequencing costs.
              Indeed. Those costs are misleading. There should be all sorts of asterisks detailing the assumptions. Might as well throw in the higher per-base cost of using PacBio to complete a genome.

              I've always hated that graph because of the misapplication of "Moore's Law". Stupid. But I have seen it in so many presentations that I just grit my teeth.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              26 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              28 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...