Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mplace
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 1

    Computer hardware

    Our lab is getting ready to purchase a server to do Next Gen Seq analysis.

    Do to the cost difference, between AMD & INTEL, we are leaning toward
    AMD.

    Does anyone have any reason why we shouldn't choose AMD over INTEL?

    FYI, the box will be 4 processors, 512 GB ram, 20+ TB of disk space.

    Thank you for the suggestions.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Originally posted by mplace View Post
    Our lab is getting ready to purchase a server to do Next Gen Seq analysis.

    Do to the cost difference, between AMD & INTEL, we are leaning toward
    AMD.

    Does anyone have any reason why we shouldn't choose AMD over INTEL?

    FYI, the box will be 4 processors, 512 GB ram, 20+ TB of disk space.

    Thank you for the suggestions.
    This type of advice is asked on SeqAnswers often and in your case you already have an idea of what you want. Ultimately you are the best judge of your group needs.

    The Intel/AMD choice is a non-issue (except from the cost perspective that you alluded to). Choosing AMD CPU's would perhaps lead to more heat generation/power needs but with a single server it is not a big problem.

    Depending on how much sequencing you are planning to do 20 TB of storage may not amount to a lot (specially if you are going to deal with raw data from illumina). You should also be planning to use some version of RAID (5 or better), so take into account "usable" storage space (after RAID) rather than total disk when doing your calculations.

    It is tempting to buy the biggest/fastest server but it may be worth thinking about the kind of analyses (alignments, assemblies) you are planning and throughput (samples/week) you expect to maintain. If you are not planning to do de novo assemblies of large genomes, 512G RAM may be overkill. Money that could be put towards more storage/a data backup solution. The latter is perhaps easy to overlook in the planning phase.
    Last edited by GenoMax; 07-19-2013, 02:29 PM.

    Comment

    • rhinoceros
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 372

      #3
      Originally posted by mplace View Post
      FYI, the box will be 4 processors, 512 GB ram, 20+ TB of disk space.

      Thank you for the suggestions.
      I do next gen seq analysis on a ~20 node cluster with 16-32 cores and 512-756GB RAM in each node and some algorithms can nevertheless run for days. Point is that there's no general rule to what computer hardware is right as it completely depends on what it's for. As to AMD vs. Intel, I don't think things like this matter unless you're building a big cluster and energy consumption becomes a significant factor..
      Last edited by rhinoceros; 07-19-2013, 04:57 PM.
      savetherhino.org

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...