Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ashmita Khanal
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2024
    • 1

    #1

    Problem with using HTseq count

    Hi everyone,
    I am using Htseq count to identify a total number of reads mapped onto each feature. While I do get results, I see that some samples have the same gene name repeated 12 times with the same gene count. Also, I see that the same result is repeated 12 times (for reference i have attached the repetitive value of __no_feature count).
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    __no_feature 1544569
    It performs one run and does it again for 12 runs and gives me the same value for all the genes 12 times. I am confused why is this happening? is it normal for the software to work like this? or is it because I have requested more nodes to run this analysis? I did check my Gtf file and the transcript id and gene id are different in my Gtf file so I do not think that should be an issue. Please find the first few lines of gtf files as well here:
    ##gtf-version X
    # GFF-like GTF i.e. not checked against any GTF specification. Conversion based on GFF input, standardised by AGAT.
    # Liftoff v1.6.3
    # /home/askhanal/miniconda3/envs/rna_seq/bin/liftoff -g ./Spurpurea_519_v5.1.gene_exons.gff3 -dir ./snigra_527M_annot/ -o ./snigra_527M_annot/snigra.527.liftoff.gff3 ./SN527M_sorted.fa ./Spurpurea_519_v5.0.fa
    Chr01 Liftoff gene 804 3346 . + . gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; Name "Sapur.001G001900"; copy_num_ID "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1_0"; coverage "0.995"; extra_copy_number "0"; sequence_ID "0.961"; valid_ORFs "0";
    Chr01 Liftoff mRNA 804 3346 . + . gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; Name "Sapur.001G001900.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; longest "1"; matches_ref_protein "False"; missing_stop_codon "True"; pacid "41822505"; valid_ORF "False";
    Chr01 Liftoff exon 804 1502 . + . gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1.exon.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41822505";
    Chr01 Liftoff exon 1541 3346 . + . gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1.exon.2"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41822505";
    Chr01 Liftoff CDS 837 1502 . + 0 gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1.CDS.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41822505";
    Chr01 Liftoff CDS 1541 3248 . + 0 gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1.CDS.2"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41822505";
    Chr01 Liftoff five_prime_UTR 804 836 . + . gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1.five_prime_UTR.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41822505";
    Chr01 Liftoff three_prime_UTR 3249 3346 . + . gene_id "Sapur.001G001900.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1.three_prime_UTR.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G001900.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41822505";
    Chr01 Liftoff gene 6845 9497 . - . gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; Name "Sapur.001G002000"; copy_num_ID "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1_0"; coverage "0.982"; extra_copy_number "0"; sequence_ID "0.902"; valid_ORFs "1";
    Chr01 Liftoff mRNA 6845 9497 . - . gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; Name "Sapur.001G002000.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; longest "1"; matches_ref_protein "False"; pacid "41821890"; valid_ORF "True";
    Chr01 Liftoff exon 6845 7216 . - . gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1.exon.2"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41821890";
    Chr01 Liftoff exon 8416 9497 . - . gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1.exon.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41821890";
    Chr01 Liftoff CDS 7153 7216 . - 1 gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1.CDS.2"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41821890";
    Chr01 Liftoff CDS 8416 8918 . - 0 gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1.CDS.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41821890";
    Chr01 Liftoff five_prime_UTR 8919 9497 . - . gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1.five_prime_UTR.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41821890";
    Chr01 Liftoff three_prime_UTR 6845 7152 . - . gene_id "Sapur.001G002000.v5.1"; transcript_id "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; ID "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1.three_prime_UTR.1"; Parent "Sapur.001G002000.1.v5.1"; extra_copy_number "0"; pacid "41821890";

    Also this is the code that i used:



    for i in {1..36}; do htseq-count -r name -s no -f bam -c htseq_no_strand/out_S${i}.tsv ../alignment_S${i}.bam ../snigra.527.liftoff.gtf ; done

    ​I have 36 samples and I have seen this issue in half of them while others are fine. I did check the file size of the bam file. For the one which gives redundant output in htseq the bam file is around 3.5g and the others have 1.5g. Not sure if it has something to do with it. Any kind of help will be appreciated.
    Thank you

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
    by SEQadmin2



    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
    ...
    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
    by SEQadmin2


    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
    ...
    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:35 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...