Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • create.share
    Member
    • May 2014
    • 20

    #1

    454 (700nt) vs 2x100 nt Illumina for sequencing low complexity metagenome

    I have a low complexity archaeal enrichment for which I want a quick (and cheap) look inside (metabolic potential) and importantly, to identity its archaeal members based on 16S (e.g.) its members. Which would you recommend: 454 with 700 nt reads, or Illumina, 2x100 reads. I heard that Illumina is better, but i this case I'm not sure.
  • msheldon
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 15

    #2
    What domain are you trying to sequence. For low cost and higher throughput go with a 2x100 MiSeq run (2x300 would even be better).
    -Matt

    Comment

    • create.share
      Member
      • May 2014
      • 20

      #3
      Originally posted by msheldon View Post
      What domain are you trying to sequence. For low cost and higher throughput go with a 2x100 MiSeq run (2x300 would even be better).
      -Matt
      I'm not trying to sequence only the 16S rRNA, but rather the whole DNA and I hope to get 16S rRNA of sufficient length (via assembly?) to identify the microbes in there. Do you think that they assembly of Illumina 2x100 will be good enough for that?

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        I assume by sequencing you want to assemble contigs and search for presence of genes involved in metabolic pathway of interest and also identify archaeal species. 16S region is not divergent enough (at least for bacteria) for correct assembly from short reads. I would prefer MiSeq 2x300 reads over 454 long reads because of accuracy and cost effectiveness.
        Last edited by nucacidhunter; 05-09-2014, 01:43 PM. Reason: correction

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...