Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jhassett
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 3

    Genetic Sequencing troubles

    Hi all,

    I am conducting genetic sequencing on the COI-COII region of the mtDNA of Apis mellifera mellifera but I am having trouble obtaining a sufficient quality genetic sequence, I can only get 70-80% coverage of the region.

    DNA extraction by chelex and amplification by PuReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR beads provide adequate level of DNA for sequencing, also any purification step tried has yielded worse results. The region of interest if heavily A and T populated but steps have been taken to prevent this hindering the sequencing.

    If anyone has encountered this problem before or has any advice it would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Jack
  • cascoamarillo
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 164

    #2
    Let's see,
    First: "genetic sequencing", I guess that means Sanger sequencing, probably sequenced by capillarity (like ABI systems), right?
    Second: "sufficient quality genetic sequence". Do you have clear and bright PCR bands? Never tried PuReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR beads before. What other purification steps have you tried?

    Metazoan COI-COII genes shouldn't be hard to amplify and sequence (unless you encounter any 'numts' in you organism). Are you amplifying the entire region or using different primer pairs?

    Comment

    • jhassett
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2015
      • 3

      #3
      Yes I am Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3130. I also have clear and bright PCR bands. I have tried the GENEJET purification kit and an in-house agarose gel purification method.
      I am amplifying the the entire region using a single pair of primers

      Comment

      • cascoamarillo
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 164

        #4
        Good.
        One more question; by "70-80% coverage of the region" you means... you sequence with one primer, or both and you get a bad coverage of a specific region when you combine them?

        Comment

        • jhassett
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2015
          • 3

          #5
          I sequenced separately forward and reverse and combined the resulting sequences, at times the forward works much better and the reverse barley works and then at other times the opposite happens. rarely are they both good reads.

          Comment

          • cascoamarillo
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2010
            • 164

            #6
            I guess this kind of hands-on troubles are hard to solve through a forum. It's difficult if I don't see the pcr gel, electropherogram, etc.
            What I would try is to clone the fragment (a few ones) and sequence with sequencing vector primers. Let's see if there's something in the region (AT rich zones) which gives troubles. You can also try using different primers for sequence the region; not just the PCR primers and maybe try to avoid the AT areas. Do you need the entire fragment? How big is it? Maybe it is worthy to split it into two. It is for a phylogenetic study?
            One method that really work for me in direct PCR sequence is ExoSapIT; you can work with small amounts of PCR product and gives you good reads.
            Good luck

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...