Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • akvarel
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 11

    #1

    ANNOVAR vs VEP

    I was comparing the results from ANNOVAR and VEP and what I found is that


    gene-based vs transcript based
    ANNOVAR (ENSEMBL ids) seems to output information only gene-based, not transcript based, therefore out of 81 SNPs I have 81(+-) genes as those that fall in intronic/exonic/ncRNA has one gene annotation and others neighboring genes.
    VEP outputs all ensembld ids of transcripts that are affected by the SNP.

    1. Is there any possibility to force ANNOVAR to take all transcripts affected by SNP into consideration?

    annovar line: annotate_variation.pl -build hg19 SNPs_annovar_input.avinput humandb/ -dbtype ensGene
    vep: variant_effect_predictor.pl -i SNPs_vep_input.txt --cache --force_overwrite --symbol


    intergenic-variantion handling
    ​If a variation is intergentic, ANNOVAR outputs the neighboring genes. VEP tells nothing about the neighboring genes.

    2. ​Is there any possibility to force VEP to output the neighboring genes for an internecine variations?


    strand information in VEP
    Strand information should be specified for VEP input and is crucial for a prediction about how the variant affects AS. ANNULAR does not need this specification.
    I do not have a strand information for my SNPs (they are taken from a paper and authors provided no information about the strand, only MAF, normal allele and risk allele).

    3. Is there a possibility to assign each SNP (using a MAF and risk,normal allele information, position) a strand using R and some database (better command line approach) ?



    Thanks
    Last edited by akvarel; 03-13-2015, 06:23 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...