Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ysnapus
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 22

    Tools for gene/pathway conervation analysis among genomes

    I am interested in looking at a number of genes in 2 or 3 closely related eukaryotic genomes. I think interesting questions to answer would be:
    1. Which subset among my genes is most conserved in all the genomes.
    2. Which set of genes show higher sequence similarity/conservation as compared to
      • all the other conserved genes
      • exon sequence identity vs related non-coding regions such as intron sequence identity, promoter region, 3' UTR, +/- 500bp around the gene. This should give an idea of negative selection pressure.
    3. Which of these genes exist in syntenic regions and which of these regions seem to have moved to different regions in the genome.



    I am trying to think which questions would be appropriate to ask, and good tools to answer them rather than manually running hundreds of different custom analyses.

    I have found the following tools, but they all seem to be doing a specific analysis for a given ortholog pair/region:
    • Phastcons for producing conservation scores per base and identifying blocks of conserved regions within genes.
    • PIECE (pubmed 21041978) and SVC (pubmed 15991338) for exon-intron comparisons.
    • Synmap for whole genome synteny.
    • Gevo to visualize regions for conserved elements.
    • MUMmer for whole chromosome alignment.


    As you can see, these tools solve slightly related problems, and many of them are visual front ends and can't be used easily to run systemic analyses from a script.

    What sort of tools would you recommend and which questions should I be asking?

    (crossposted on https://www.biostars.org/p/137177/)

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...