Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #16
    "Next Generation" does have a nicer ring to it than "Markedly Faster than Last Year (but wait until next year)"

    Comment

    • ECO
      --Site Admin--
      • Oct 2007
      • 1360

      #17
      Originally posted by krobison View Post
      "Next Generation" does have a nicer ring to it than "Markedly Faster than Last Year (but wait until next year)"
      Winner!

      SEQanswers: The Markedly Faster than Last Year Sequencing Community

      Comment

      • GW_OK
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 411

        #18
        I like it, too. "All samples will undergo Markedly Faster Than Last Year sequencing to identify rare variants".

        Comment

        • steven
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 269

          #19
          the acronym is not the sexiest though..

          Comment

          • Joann
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2008
            • 230

            #20
            LBP sequencing

            OK, so how about LBP (little bitty pieces) sequencing?

            Comment

            • ECO
              --Site Admin--
              • Oct 2007
              • 1360

              #21
              Originally posted by Joann View Post
              OK, so how about LBP (little bitty pieces) sequencing?
              Not all technologies are short read.

              Comment

              • GW_OK
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 411

                #22
                "All samples will undergo Markedly Faster and Slightly Longer Than Last Year sequencing to identify rare variants".

                Comment

                • jrt@thompsonclan.org
                  Junior Member
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 2

                  #23
                  Which generation?

                  By my count Sanger is 3rd generation. The 1st nucleic acid sequence I remember was a tRNA sequence obtained by analysis of nuclease products on 2D thin layer chromatography. Then Maxam-Gilbert chemical sequencing emerged as the 1st tractable way to sequence longer stretches of DNA (how many or you know how to pour a meter long, 0.5mm thick polyacrylamide gel with no bubbles?). Then came the Sanger method which was much less finicky than chemical sequencing and ruled for more or less a human generation (albeit with technical improvements like switching to capillary electrophoresis along the way).

                  Now what you have is the parallel evolution of a variety of different technologies. I think the generational analogy has broken down. Perhaps a speciation analogy is more applicable now. I don't see single molecule sequencing as the next wave per se, rather each technology competing now has a niche application and often two technologies need to be combined to do a particular job well.

                  Comment

                  • GW_OK
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 411

                    #24
                    How about Age of Aquarius Sequencing? We could all grow our hair out, it'd be groovy.

                    Comment

                    • Joann
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 230

                      #25
                      Oh, the gels I have poured....

                      I did not have any bubble problems with acrylamide gels--would simply degas a solution of 5x recrystalized acrylamide before pouring....

                      Additionally, I've made purified whole protein samples, but never got to perform sequencing on those. Protein sequencing provided us the first glimpse at evolutionary conservation and those isoforms in action. Now we have the short course.

                      Comment

                      • kedes
                        Junior Member
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 1

                        #26
                        It will be "XGen": Before X PRIZE, After X PRIZE

                        How to identify sequencing technologies will become straightforward after some team demonstrates they can win the $10M Archon Genomic X PRIZE <http://genomics.xprize.org/>. The stringent requirements of the AGXP will distinguish all platforms capable of achieving such goals and henceforth sequencing platforms would be identified as “X PRIZE Capable” versus those that are not.

                        Larry Kedes
                        Senior Advisor. X PRIZE Foundation
                        Scientific Director, Archon Genomic X PRIZE

                        Comment

                        • janejane
                          Member
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 15

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Michael.James.Clark View Post

                          ECO, I actually think you might be okay leaving "next generation" in the tag line. I mean, we are always going to be discussing the "next generation" (plus some of the last generation, probably).
                          I like the idea of always having the "next gen" name.

                          Comment

                          Latest Articles

                          Collapse

                          • SEQadmin2
                            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                            by SEQadmin2



                            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                            ...
                            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                          • SEQadmin2
                            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                            by SEQadmin2


                            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                            ...
                            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                          ad_right_rmr

                          Collapse

                          News

                          Collapse

                          Topics Statistics Last Post
                          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
                          0 responses
                          16 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
                          0 responses
                          16 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                          0 responses
                          35 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                          0 responses
                          42 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Working...