Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alagurajvelu
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 6

    Hosting chipseq data

    Hello,
    We have generated few chipseq data on Arabidopsis thaliana. I want to host my WIG files for reviewers of our manuscript to view the data. Is there any genome browser available (public server/program) to host our data ?. UCSC allows genome data to be hosted on their server for four months. But Arabidopsis thaliana is not available on their server. Is there a better way to disseminate the data ?.
    Thanks,
    Alaguraj Veluchamy
  • gsgs
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 139

    #2
    just put it on some website and take care that it will be found if someone
    types the suitable keywords into a search engine.

    Suppose, you wanted to find the data of some similar species,
    for what keywords would you search ?

    let's collect keywords here ...

    [the first 20 nucleotides of chromosome 1] ?


    plus some pages that contain collections of links to genomes data


    ----------------------------------------
    found this:

    Last edited by gsgs; 12-24-2015, 01:06 AM.

    Comment

    • Alagurajvelu
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 6

      #3
      I am talking about genome browser (not a simple downloadable text file). A genome browser will have complete genome with all annotation. Our wig file will viewable as graph in that browser. I am talking about shareable session (https://genome.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/h...ssionHelp.html). Just look into the "Lifespan of a Session" in that link. In this session, we can load our wig data into already existing annotation and then share it to others. Do we have that kind for arabidopsis ?.

      Comment

      • epigenereg
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2015
        • 5

        #4
        I think the common practice (and for many journals a requirement) is to upload the data to GEO or alternative web archives, and give the referees access to this submission. If the referees want to view the data in whatever genome browser they like, they will find a way.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...