Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ssseq
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 3

    UCSC uploading error

    Hi everyone,

    I'm getting an error trying to upload a GFF file to the UCSC genome browser. When I copy and paste a few lines of the file, it works fine so I know the file format is ok. When I try to do the whole file I get this error.
    ********
    File 'splitetv2moab.gff' - track load error (track name='ct_UserTrack_3545'):
    start -1, end 101 out of range in findBin (max is 512M)
    ********
    There are no "-1"s in the file. I thought perhaps it was because the file was too big (118 MB- not that big in general); so I split it into 4 files, but that still isn't working.

    Has anyone seen this error before or have any suggestions on how to get this file to upload?

    Thanks,
    Sarah
  • biznatch
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 124

    #2
    I can't help with that error specifically, but the UCSC genome browser file size limit is 500mb and approx. 100million lines (although I've uploaded up to 200million). So file size probably isn't your problem. If the file is too big, it'll either tell you it's too big, over 500mb, or it will just time out and go to a blank screen.

    Comment

    • samanta
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 108

      #3
      Seems like your gff file has problems. The best way to sort it would be to partition the file into two parts and see whether each part loads fine. Trying first few lines does not help, if the error is in 6000th line or so.

      BTW, when you partition the file, please try to make sure it does not split data from a gene into two parts. Partitioning along chromosomes or scaffolds works best.
      http://homolog.us

      Comment

      • ssseq
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 3

        #4
        Thanks for the comments- I had actually tried that and still couldn't figure out why it didn't work. I ended up just converting to .bed format, which worked fine. Thanks for the help!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...